IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i4p789-803.html

‘Local Hubs and Global Gateways’: Understanding the impact of Singapore’s master plan on urban polycentricity

Author

Listed:
  • Cai Wu
  • Mingshu Wang
  • Jiong Wang
  • Duncan Smith
  • Menno-Jan Kraak

Abstract

Master plans are pivotal in strategising urban development, dictating land use, building height, and development intensity. These plans influence the spatial arrangement of urban infrastructure and activities, shaping the morphological and dynamic urban spatial structure. This study evaluates Singapore’s master plan’s effect on urban spatial structure, utilising data extracted from the master plan to project future land use and spatial interaction scenarios. By simulating the changing commercial floor space in different urban centres and its impact on commuting patterns, we evaluate the master plan’s impact on urban spatial structure and promoting polycentric urban development. Singapore’s master plan, with a clear vision towards polycentricity through the ‘Local hubs and global gateways’ strategy, is examined for its impact on urban spatial structure. The study uses urban mobility data and spatial network analysis to reveal how the master plan aims to decentralise development from the Central Business District (CBD) and distribute economic activities across various regions. Our findings indicate that regional centres and local hubs are becoming more autonomous while the CBD remains dominant. The results also highlight the importance of integrating morphological and functional polycentricity measurements and socioeconomic indicators to comprehensively evaluate urban development strategies. This study contributes to understanding urban spatial structure and offers practical insights for future urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai Wu & Mingshu Wang & Jiong Wang & Duncan Smith & Menno-Jan Kraak, 2025. "‘Local Hubs and Global Gateways’: Understanding the impact of Singapore’s master plan on urban polycentricity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(4), pages 789-803, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:789-803
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241267070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241267070
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241267070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xingjian Liu & Ben Derudder & Kang Wu, 2016. "Measuring Polycentric Urban Development in China: An Intercity Transportation Network Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1302-1315, August.
    2. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    3. Hui Cheng & David Shaw, 2018. "Polycentric development practice in master planning: the case of China," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 163-179, April.
    4. Evert Meijers, 2008. "Measuring Polycentricity and its Promises," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(9), pages 1313-1323, October.
    5. Somwrita Sarkar & Hao Wu & David M Levinson, 2020. "Measuring polycentricity via network flows, spatial interaction and percolation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2402-2422, September.
    6. Martijn Burger & Evert Meijers, 2012. "Form Follows Function? Linking Morphological and Functional Polycentricity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1127-1149, April.
    7. Martijn J. Burger & Bert van der Knaap & Ronald S. Wall, 2014. "Polycentricity and the Multiplexity of Urban Networks," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 816-840, April.
    8. Liu, Xi & Gong, Li & Gong, Yongxi & Liu, Yu, 2015. "Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 78-90.
    9. Meixu Chen & Dani Arribas-Bel & Alex Singleton, 2019. "Understanding the dynamics of urban areas of interest through volunteered geographic information," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 89-109, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Chen & Oleg Golubchikov & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Measuring polycentric structures of megaregions in China: Linking morphological and functional dimensions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(8), pages 2272-2288, October.
    2. Yang Xiao & Yao Wang & Siyu Miao & Xinyi Niu, 2021. "Assessing polycentric urban development in Shanghai, China, with detailed passive mobile phone data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(9), pages 2656-2674, November.
    3. Chen Zhong & Markus Schläpfer & Stefan Müller Arisona & Michael Batty & Carlo Ratti & Gerhard Schmitt, 2017. "Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 437-455, February.
    4. Stella Kostopoulou & Paraskevi-Kali Sofianou & Konstantinos Tsiokanos, 2021. "Silk Road Heritage Branding and Polycentric Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Cats, Oded & Wang, Qian & Zhao, Yu, 2015. "Identification and classification of public transport activity centres in Stockholm using passenger flows data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-22.
    6. Weiyang Zhang & Ben Derudder, 2019. "How sensitive are measures of polycentricity to the choice of ‘centres’? A methodological and empirical exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3339-3357, December.
    7. Feng, Yuhao & Wu, Shufan & Wu, Peixin & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Bian, Meng, 2018. "Spatiotemporal characterization of megaregional poly-centrality: Evidence for new urban hypotheses and implications for polycentric policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 712-731.
    8. Hui Cheng & David Shaw, 2021. "POLYCENTRIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE FORMATION OF EDGE URBAN AREAS IN CHINA'S MEGA CITY REGIONS: Case Study of Nansha, Guangzhou," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1009-1027, November.
    9. Hashem Dadashpoor & Neda Malekzadeh & Sadegh Saeidishirvan, 2023. "A typology of metropolitan spatial structure: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 13667-13693, December.
    10. Yue, Wenze & Wang, Tianyu & Liu, Yong & Zhang, Qun & Ye, Xinyue, 2019. "Mismatch of morphological and functional polycentricity in Chinese cities: An evidence from land development and functional linkage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Antti Vasanen, 2012. "Functional Polycentricity: Examining Metropolitan Spatial Structure through the Connectivity of Urban Sub-centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(16), pages 3627-3644, December.
    12. Antti Vasanen, 2013. "Spatial Integration and Functional Balance in Polycentric Urban Systems: A Multi-Scalar Approach," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(4), pages 410-425, September.
    13. Wenzheng Li & Stephan Schmidt, 2024. "The spatial‐temporal evolution of urban development patterns in Chinese cities: Dynamics and interpretations," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    14. Jili Xu & Xu Zhang & Haitao Ma & Yuyao Ye, 2025. "Delineating polycentric megacity regions based on intra- and extra-regional economic transactions between emerging high-tech industries and producer services: a case study on the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Michiel van Meeteren & Ate Poorthuis & Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox, 2016. "Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1278-1298, May.
    16. Somwrita Sarkar & Hao Wu & David M Levinson, 2020. "Measuring polycentricity via network flows, spatial interaction and percolation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2402-2422, September.
    17. Panagiotis NIKOLOPOULOS & Andreas GKOUZOS & Athanasios PAPADASKALOPOULOS, 2018. "Morphological Polycentricity In Southern Europe: Evidence At The National Level," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(4), pages 73-93, November.
    18. Ryan Thomas & Stephan Schmidt & Stefan Siedentop, 2022. "Toward comparative polycentricity scores: Assessing variations in regional delineation and subcenter identification," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1597-1611, July.
    19. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas Phelps, 2018. "Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 443-460, February.
    20. Mingshu Wang, 2021. "Polycentric urban development and urban amenities: Evidence from Chinese cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 400-416, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:4:p:789-803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.