IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i2p564-568.html

Visual analytics of graffiti spatial patterns across 30 European city centres

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras
  • Eleftheria Konstantinidou

Abstract

Graffiti as an urban phenomenon comes in different forms and materials, from simple spray slogans to wall paintings and art, containing multi-thematic content. Despite the contradictory nature of various literature opinions, reports of a positive association between wall-graffiti and fear of crime or streetscape value have emerged. However, comparative urban studies registering graffiti locations are non-existent, thereby hindering the benchmarking of urban liveability. In this work, the spatial patterns of graffiti-vandalism across 30 European city centres were investigated, using Google Street View–derived observations. A significant variation in graffiti presence across Europe was recorded, ranging from about 3%–9% of street segments in London, Oslo and Vienna, to roughly 70%–76% in Madrid, Athens and Sofia. In addition, their spatial polarisation that reflects the presence of potential socio-spatial inequities requiring further attention was demonstrated. Overall, the created geo-visualisations could enable European policymakers to facilitate better-informed response strategies and researchers to delve into the effects of graffities on urban systems and societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras & Eleftheria Konstantinidou, 2023. "Visual analytics of graffiti spatial patterns across 30 European city centres," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 564-568, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:564-568
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221149426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221149426
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221149426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Dovey & Simon Wollan & Ian Woodcock, 2012. "Placing Graffiti: Creating and Contesting Character in Inner-city Melbourne," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 21-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Bragaglia, 2024. "Another sign on the wall: Graffiti slogans between dissent and post-political dynamics," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(7), pages 1224-1241, November.
    2. Miza Moreau, 2024. "In/formal reappropriations: Spatialised needs and desires in residential alleys in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1031-1048, May.
    3. Shiran Geng & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei & Zora Vrcelj, 2022. "Understanding the Street Layout of Melbourne’s Chinatown as an Urban Heritage Precinct in a Grid System Using Space Syntax Methods and Field Observation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Hwayoon Seok & Yeajin Joo & Yoonjae Nam, 2020. "An Analysis of the Sustainable Tourism Value of Graffiti Tours through Social Media: Focusing on TripAdvisor Reviews of Graffiti Tours in Bogota, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Dirk H. R. Spennemann & Deanna Duffy, 2025. "The Ephemeral Cultural Landscape of an Australian Federal Election," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:564-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.