IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i9p2640-2655.html

Estimating public space metrics from nineteenth-century urban cartography: Barcelona’s Cerdà Plan of urban expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Santasusagna Riu
  • Joan Tort Donada
  • Maria Teresa Vadrí Fortuny

    (University of Barcelona, Spain)

  • Valerià Paül Carril

Abstract

Urban cartography enables us to trace the historical and spatial evolution of human settlements, but it also furnishes us with the opportunity to obtain and analyse urban data from the perspective of the present day. Urban plans drafted for the reform and expansion of a city can provide us with valuable urban information about the planned use of new public space. In Western Europe, the historical cartography of Barcelona (Spain) maps the city’s mid-nineteenth century urban expansion project designed to fulfil egalitarian, social and hygienist goals. Here, using geographic information system tools, we digitize Barcelona’s cartography so as to create an urban dataset based on the city’s urban plans – the Cerdà Plans (1859 and 1863) – and to estimate its public space typology. Social centres, hospitals, green spaces, residential areas and communication infrastructures are identified and metrised, and urban public open spaces are analysed using various urban indicators. The urban data thus obtained represent a notable advance on attempts to quantify Cerdà ’s original project. The importance attached to public space (>75%) and to both communication infrastructure and urban public open spaces is indicative of the desire to create a new city and to break with the values of old Barcelona. In short, the data obtained serve to undertake a detailed comparison with the present-day reality of Barcelona.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Santasusagna Riu & Joan Tort Donada & Maria Teresa Vadrí Fortuny & Valerià Paül Carril, 2021. "Estimating public space metrics from nineteenth-century urban cartography: Barcelona’s Cerdà Plan of urban expansion," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(9), pages 2640-2655, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:9:p:2640-2655
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320987562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320987562
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320987562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Setha Low & Kurt Iveson, 2016. "Propositions for more just urban public spaces," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 10-31, February.
    2. Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen & Mireia Gascon & David Martinez & Anna Ponjoan & Jordi Blanch & Maria del Mar Garcia-Gil & Rafel Ramos & Maria Foraster & Natalie Mueller & Ana Espinosa & Marta Cirach & Haneen, 2018. "Air Pollution, Noise, Blue Space, and Green Space and Premature Mortality in Barcelona: A Mega Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Dempsey, Seraphim & Lyons, Seán & Nolan, Anne, 2018. "Urban Green Space and Obesity in Older Adults," Papers RB201810, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Lily Kiminami & Kenneth Button & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 2006. "Public Facilities Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3600.
    5. Judit Bodnar, 2015. "Reclaiming public space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2090-2104, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tali Hatuka & Eran Toch, 2017. "Being visible in public space: The normalisation of asymmetrical visibility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 984-998, March.
    2. Mohamed Saleh & Ward Rauws, 2022. "The urban political never sleeps: A framework for tracing emergent counter-responses to depoliticisation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(6), pages 1272-1289, September.
    3. Peter Barlow & Sean Lyons & Anne Nolan, 2021. "How Perceived Adequacy of Open Public Space Is Related to Objective Green Space and Individuals’ Opinions of Area-Level Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Jordi Honey-Rosés & Oscar Zapata, 2023. "Green Spaces with Fewer People Improve Self-Reported Affective Experience and Mood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:a6gbm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tauri Tuvikene & Wladimir Sgibnev & Wojciech Kȩbłowski & Jason Finch, 2023. "Public transport as public space: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2963-2978, November.
    7. Bradley Rink, 2023. "Public space on the move: Mediating mobility, stillness and encounter on a Cape Town bus," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3027-3044, November.
    8. Sifan Guo & Xuesen Zheng & Timothy Heath, 2022. "Research on the Design of Community Museums Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Kostov Ivo & Palicki Sławomir & Rącka Izabela, 2017. "The Activities of Local Governments in the Revitalization of Public Space in Bulgaria and Poland," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 103-111, March.
    10. Paul Milbourne, 2021. "Growing public spaces in the city: Community gardening and the making of new urban environments of publicness," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 2901-2919, November.
    11. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Xuefan Zhang, 2017. "Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: The ideal type of mass private property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3464-3479, November.
    13. Alessandro Rigolon & Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Olivia McAnirlin & Hyunseo (Violet) Yoon, 2021. "Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Alberto Arnedo-Pena & Joan Puig-Barberà & Juan Bellido-Blasco & MªAngeles Romeu-Garcia & Mª Rosario Pac-Sa & Francisco Guillen-Grima, 2020. "Production of Vegetables and Artichokes Is Associated with Lower Cardiovascular Mortality: An Ecological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Marie Gibert-Flutre, 2022. "Rhythmanalysis: Rethinking the politics of everyday negotiations in ordinary public spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 279-297, February.
    17. Jenny Mbaye & Cecilia Dinardi, 2019. "Ins and outs of the cultural polis: Informality, culture and governance in the global South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 578-593, February.
    18. Ibrahim Z. Bahreldin, 2020. "Beyond the Sit-In: Public Space Production and Appropriation in Sudan’s December Revolution, 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Vitale, Tommaso Prof, 2024. "Spazi pubblici come servizi comuni: una sociologia comparata delle modalità di regolazione per la convivialità urbana," SocArXiv a6gbm, Center for Open Science.
    20. Shuran Li & Chengwei Wang & Liying Rong & Shiqi Zhou & Zhiqiang Wu, 2024. "Understanding How People Perceive and Interact with Public Space through Social Media Big Data: A Case Study of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, September.
    21. Alasdair Jones, 2021. "Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 425-440, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:9:p:2640-2655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.