IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i3p555-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-path dependent urban growth potential mapping using a data-driven evidential belief function

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Arasteh

    (University of Tehran, Iran)

  • Rahim Ali Abbaspour

    (School of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran)

  • Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny

Abstract

Improper urbanization and its environmental impacts have imposed many problems to humanity. Recently, numerous studies have been conducted using different methods to understand and manage spatial and temporal changes in urbanization. In this study, the capability of the data-driven evidential belief function model as a non-path dependent urban growth potential mapping method was evaluated. Using this approach, the conventional trend-based urban growth prediction procedure is transformed into a data integration task through which the potential locations for urban sprawl in response to multiple environmental and anthropogenic variables could be determined. Therefore, true knowledge about urban growth conditioning factors and their quantitative relationships with built-up areas can be obtained. The multivariate-based logistic regression model as a well-known urban growth modelling method was employed to check the efficiency and validity of the proposed evidential belief function model. Furthermore, a hybrid approach based on the logistic regression model results coupled with the data-driven evidential belief function model was developed. The validation results using the relative operating characteristic method indicated that the evidential belief function, logistic regression, and the hybrid methods’ accuracy were 91.81, 84.72, and 92.34%, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that while the proposed evidential belief function and hybrid methods for non-path dependent urban growth potential mapping yielded approximately equal results, both of them outperformed the logistic regression model which is an indication of their reliability and accuracy. The proposed evidential belief function and hybrid methods are best suited for integration in different environmental and socio-economic scenarios enhancing the models for urban allocation tasks. In this way, local communities and policy-makers can make smarter decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Arasteh & Rahim Ali Abbaspour & Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny, 2021. "Non-path dependent urban growth potential mapping using a data-driven evidential belief function," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 555-573, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:555-573
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808319880219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808319880219
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808319880219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biswajeet Pradhan & Mohammed Abokharima & Mustafa Jebur & Mahyat Tehrany, 2014. "Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the evidential belief function model in GIS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 1019-1042, September.
    2. Chang-Jo Chung & Andrea Fabbri, 2003. "Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 451-472, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo Rodolpho Pereira Hader & Fábio Augusto Gomes Vieira Reis & Anna Silvia Palcheco Peixoto, 2022. "Landslide risk assessment considering socionatural factors: methodology and application to Cubatão municipality, São Paulo, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1273-1304, January.
    2. D. Costanzo & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & E. Rotigliano, 2012. "Exporting a Google Earth ™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 103-114, March.
    3. E. Rotigliano & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & D. Costanzo & V. Agnesi, 2012. "Slope units-based flow susceptibility model: using validation tests to select controlling factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 143-153, March.
    4. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    5. Netra Bhandary & Ranjan Dahal & Manita Timilsina & Ryuichi Yatabe, 2013. "Rainfall event-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 365-388, October.
    6. Shabnam Mehrnoor & Maryam Robati & Mir Masoud Kheirkhah Zarkesh & Forough Farsad & Shahram Baikpour, 2023. "Land subsidence hazard assessment based on novel hybrid approach: BWM, weighted overlay index (WOI), and support vector machine (SVM)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(3), pages 1997-2030, February.
    7. Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri & Slobodan B. Mickovski, 2021. "A Simple GIS-Based Tool for the Detection of Landslide-Prone Zones on a Coastal Slope in Scotland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Massimo Conforti & Pietro Aucelli & Gaetano Robustelli & Fabio Scarciglia, 2011. "Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 881-898, March.
    9. Nikolaos Tavoularis & George Papathanassiou & Athanassios Ganas & Panagiotis Argyrakis, 2021. "Development of the Landslide Susceptibility Map of Attica Region, Greece, Based on the Method of Rock Engineering System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    10. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    11. Massimo Conforti & Gaetano Robustelli & Francesco Muto & Salvatore Critelli, 2012. "Application and validation of bivariate GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment for the Vitravo river catchment (Calabria, south Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 127-141, March.
    12. Jörg Grunert & Sigrid Hess, 2010. "The Upper Middle Rhine Valley as a risk area," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(3), pages 577-597, December.
    13. Halil Akinci & Mustafa Zeybek, 2021. "Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1515-1543, September.
    14. Mehrnoosh Jadda & Helmi Shafri & Shattri Mansor, 2011. "PFR model and GiT for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study from Central Alborz, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 57(2), pages 395-412, May.
    15. I. P. Kovács & T. Bugya & Sz. Czigány & M. Defilippi & D. Lóczy & P. Riccardi & L. Ronczyk & P. Pasquali, 2019. "How to avoid false interpretations of Sentinel-1A TOPSAR interferometric data in landslide mapping? A case study: recent landslides in Transdanubia, Hungary," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(2), pages 693-712, March.
    16. Prafull Singh & Ankit Sharma & Ujjwal Sur & Praveen Kumar Rai, 2021. "Comparative landslide susceptibility assessment using statistical information value and index of entropy model in Bhanupali-Beri region, Himachal Pradesh, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5233-5250, April.
    17. Ananta Pradhan & Yun-Tae Kim, 2014. "Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek, South Korea," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 72(2), pages 1189-1217, June.
    18. Aminreza Neshat & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2015. "Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 1565-1585, September.
    19. L. Lombardo & M. Cama & C. Conoscenti & M. Märker & E. Rotigliano, 2015. "Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messi," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1621-1648, December.
    20. Esteban Bravo-López & Tomás Fernández Del Castillo & Chester Sellers & Jorge Delgado-García, 2023. "Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:555-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.