IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v42y2015i1p110-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Euler Character: A New Type of Visual Landscape Metric?

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Sang

    (The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, and Swedish University of Agriculture, Box 52, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden)

  • Caroline Hägerhäll
  • Ã…sa Ode

Abstract

Landscape-preference theories such as prospect-refuge theory and Kaplan and Kaplan's landscape-preference matrix and theories of visual perception propose that the physical structure of the landscape has a direct psychological effect on people due to evolved sensitivity to particular defining characteristics. Efforts to identify consistent quantitative relationships between metrics of these characteristics and human preference have had some success. However, the field has also faced some criticisms due to low explanatory power in the results reducing confidence that relationships found can be applied to other contexts. In this paper we argue that dependence on generalised planar maps for the derivation of the metrics but on viewpoint-specific perspective photographs for the preference data is a potential cause of low explanatory power. How viewpoint change may affect scene characteristics needs to be better understood if representative viewpoints are to be chosen to allow results which are general to an area, in particular the difference between discreet (topological) changes and continuous changes. This paper presents the results of an experiment to test whether the topological complexity of a view, as measured by the Euler character of the horizon graph, has perceptual significance. We investigate if images with higher horizon-graph complexity were considered more interesting than those with lower graph complexity via a forced-choice Internet survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Sang & Caroline Hägerhäll & Ã…sa Ode, 2015. "The Euler Character: A New Type of Visual Landscape Metric?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(1), pages 110-132, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:1:p:110-132
    DOI: 10.1068/b38183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b38183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b38183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:1:p:110-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.