IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v37y2010i5p895-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambiguities in Knowledge Production: Multimodal Analysis of Discourse and Dramaturgy in Public Participation GIS Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Jarkko Bamberg

    (Department of Regional Studies, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Finland)

Abstract

A web-based collaborative-argumentation mapping experiment, which was used as part of a planning process in the city of Tampere, Finland, revealed a need for analytical tools to interpret the users' meaning making with this particular public participation GIS instrument. The main reason for this was the complexity of mediated interaction between different actors in and by means of the application: written comments, graphic symbols, and aerial photographs were combined to make meaning in particular context-specific situations. An analytical framework is discussed; it is shown to have the potential to grasp this type of signification process by studying the dynamics of different semiotic means and the production of discourse and settings in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarkko Bamberg, 2010. "Ambiguities in Knowledge Production: Multimodal Analysis of Discourse and Dramaturgy in Public Participation GIS Experiments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(5), pages 895-910, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:5:p:895-910
    DOI: 10.1068/b36002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b36002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b36002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:5:p:895-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.