IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v28y2001i3p419-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earthquake Risk Analysis for Los Angeles County under Present and Planned Land Uses

Author

Listed:
  • Robert B Olshansky
  • Yueming Wu

Abstract

Local governments rarely use risk analysis, the most sophisticated level of hazard assessment, to inform their planning and development decisions. But new tools are rapidly becoming available to accomplish such analysis. In this paper we present an example of an earthquake risk analysis for Los Angeles County, using available land-use maps, a probabilistic earthquake hazard model developed by the Southern California Earthquake Center, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's new HAZUS earthquake loss estimation software. We computed the annual expected loss owing to earthquakes and the spatial variation of this risk. The analysis shows that the annual long-term earthquake risk in Los Angeles County, as a result of direct structural and nonstructural damage, is $388 million per year. We also investigated the extent to which planned future land-use growth would affect this risk estimate. We found that planned growth of 14.2% would result in an increase in annual risk to $449.5 million, a 15.8% increase over the risk to current land uses. Because of ever increasing disaster costs, planners need to be able to evaluate the risks that their communities face, both in the present and in the future. It is particularly important for planners to be sure that they are not disproportionately planning future growth for hazardous locations. In this paper we describe some ways in which to perform such evaluations, by using tools that have only recently become available.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert B Olshansky & Yueming Wu, 2001. "Earthquake Risk Analysis for Los Angeles County under Present and Planned Land Uses," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(3), pages 419-432, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:28:y:2001:i:3:p:419-432
    DOI: 10.1068/b2639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2639
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:28:y:2001:i:3:p:419-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.