IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v27y2000i4p583-598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS, Land Use, and Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Bibby

    (Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, Englands)

  • John Shepherd

    (School of Geography, Birkbeck College, University of London, 7-15 Gresse Street, London W1P 2LL, England)

Abstract

Despite the historically close relationship between GIS and land-use studies, there has been little constructive dialogue on the relationship between GIS theory and land-use analysis. The distinctive feature of land-use studies is their grounding in the idea of social purpose. “Purpose†—the telic dimension—is one of four dimensions of meaning discussed by Moravcsik and based ultimately on the work of Aristotle. So far in GIS, however, only the formal dimension has been emphasised. In this paper we draw on the work of philosophers such as Searle and Goodman to show the significance of the telic and constitutive dimensions of meaning for GIS and land-use studies. We also consider the relationship between terms in natural language and GIS-based analysis. Against this background we consider how GIS applications can be classified in relation to their treatment of language — purpose†and “space — time†. We conclude by suggesting that familiar GIS problems such as the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy are instances of more general philosophical problems and that insights from linguistic philosophy can contribute to GIS development.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Bibby & John Shepherd, 2000. "GIS, Land Use, and Representation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(4), pages 583-598, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:27:y:2000:i:4:p:583-598
    DOI: 10.1068/b2647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2647
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:27:y:2000:i:4:p:583-598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.