IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v20y1993i2p163-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation and Individualism in Design

Author

Listed:
  • R Coyne
  • A Snodgrass

Abstract

Individualism encourages designers to be incommunicative, protective of their ideas, and unable to work as a team or involve clients and the community in the process. Design requires effective collaboration. The argument is advanced here that exhortations to collaborate and cooperate are often frustrated by the current commitment within academic and professional circles to the legacy of Descartes. Design as an activity of the individual emerges from both the Cartesian rationalistic tradition and the Romantic countertradition that is focused on spirit and genius. Counter to this assertion of the primacy of the individual is the argument that reason is a product of shared experience. This does not mean that reason is accomplished through conformity to consensus. The inference of conformity can be circumvented by recourse to Gadamer's metaphors of effective historical consciousness and participation in the hermeneutic circle. The conclusion is that the metaphor of the individual as the focus of reason and hence the source of design genius is appropriate in particular contexts, but needs to be seen against other more helpful metaphors of participation and involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • R Coyne & A Snodgrass, 1993. "Cooperation and Individualism in Design," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(2), pages 163-174, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:20:y:1993:i:2:p:163-174
    DOI: 10.1068/b200163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b200163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b200163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:20:y:1993:i:2:p:163-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.