IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v58y2026i5p718-742.html

Platform freedom: Financial subjectivity at the nexus of investment and social media

Author

Listed:
  • Desiree Fields
  • Julien Migozzi

Abstract

Platforms enabling individuals to invest in stocks, cryptocurrency, real estate, and other assets have proliferated globally. Meanwhile, narratives of financial freedom and investment content spread rapidly on social media platforms. As platform infrastructures play an increasingly significant role in changing financial markets and mediating individual behaviors and aspirations, we suspect they are also shaping the financial subjectivity of retail investors. Combining qualitative and computational methods, we analyze a large corpus of Reddit conversations to study how individuals navigate social media and investment platforms. We find that the financial subjectivity of retail investors is co-created through investment platforms, where individuals allocate capital and enact their investment decisions, and social media platforms, where they share information and debate and question investment decisions. The effort to claim agency and control financial futures plays out within shifting and stratified infrastructures that are also subject to algorithmic control. In this sense, the goal and practice of financial freedom is “platformed†: exercised through, conditioned by, and fleshed out within platform architectures. Always-on, platform-mediated markets call for further scrutiny and methodological innovations to ground their inner workings and algorithmic logics in everyday life. This paper charts a path to study the production of economic knowledge and the mundane, sociotechnical construction of financial markets in ways that both theoretically acknowledge and methodologically center the role of platforms and digital technologies in circulating capital, constructing assets, and shaping financial subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Desiree Fields & Julien Migozzi, 2026. "Platform freedom: Financial subjectivity at the nexus of investment and social media," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(5), pages 718-742, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:58:y:2026:i:5:p:718-742
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X261429864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X261429864
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X261429864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:58:y:2026:i:5:p:718-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.