IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v57y2025i6p757-775.html

From ‘mom-and-pop’ to ‘vulnerable landlords’: Debunking the mythical figures that legitimise rent extraction and challenge rent control policies

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Gil

    (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Madrid, Spain)

  • Lorenzo Vidal

    (UOC, Spain)

  • Miguel A Martínez

    (Uppsala Universitet, Sweden)

Abstract

This paper critically examines the widely spread myths of ‘mom-and-pop’ and ‘vulnerable landlords’ within the Spanish rental market, by exploring their role in legitimising rent extraction and opposing rent control measures. Amid rising rental prices and increasing tenant impoverishment in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, this study addresses how these landlord archetypes distort public and political discourse, thereby influencing rental market regulations. We debunk these myths by conducting a critical analysis of statistical categorisation and available evidence. Our findings reveal that landlords in Spain, rather than being predominantly small-scale, financially vulnerable individuals, represent a small minority who are among the higher income earners and are typically multi-property landlords benefitting substantially from the rental market. We therefore argue that the main goal of the discourses conveyed by the prevalent myths regarding landlords is to obscure the actual socioeconomic structure of the rental market and to preserve it as is. These myths serve to shield the interests of the capitalist class by presenting their objectives as aligned with broader societal needs, which we interpret here according to the Gramscian notion of ‘hegemony’. We conclude that, as rental housing continues to expand as a key means of capital accumulation, these discourses will intensify and will acquire greater political centrality. Revealing these contradictions therefore becomes crucial to delegitimising existing rental structures and advocating for rental regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Gil & Lorenzo Vidal & Miguel A Martínez, 2025. "From ‘mom-and-pop’ to ‘vulnerable landlords’: Debunking the mythical figures that legitimise rent extraction and challenge rent control policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(6), pages 757-775, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:6:p:757-775
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251342031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X251342031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hang Kei Ho, 2020. "Inside the world of middle-class Hong Kong transnational property investors: ‘5980 miles to my second home’," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 75-99, January.
    2. Kath Hulse & Margaret Reynolds & Chris Martin, 2020. "The Everyman archetype: discursive reframing of private landlords in the financialization of rental housing," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 981-1003, July.
    3. Justin Kadi & Cody Hochstenbach & Christian Lennartz, 2020. "Multiple property ownership in times of late homeownership: a new conceptual vocabulary," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 6-24, January.
    4. Iain White & Gauri Nandedkar, 2021. "The housing crisis as an ideological artefact: Analysing how political discourse defines, diagnoses, and responds," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 213-234, February.
    5. Sarah Bierre & Philippa Howden-Chapman, 2020. "Telling stories: the role of narratives in rental housing policy change in New Zealand," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 29-49, January.
    6. Peter A. Kemp, 2020. "Commentary on multiple property ownership," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 144-155, January.
    7. Danielle Kerrigan, 2022. "‘Don’t wake papa bear!’ Understanding media representations of landlord-tenant relations," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 587-609, July.
    8. Peter A. Kemp, 2020. "Commentary on multiple property ownership," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 144-155, January.
    9. Richard Ronald & Justin Kadi, 2018. "The Revival of Private Landlords in Britain’s Post-Homeownership Society," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 786-803, November.
    10. Cody Hochstenbach, 2022. "Landlord Elites on the Dutch Housing Market: Private Landlordism, Class, and Social Inequality," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(4), pages 327-354, August.
    11. José Manuel Torrado & Ricardo Duque-Calvache & Isabel Palomares-Linares, 2020. "The demand-side determinants of multiple property ownership in Spain," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 120-143, January.
    12. Justin Kadi & Cody Hochstenbach & Christian Lennartz, 2020. "Multiple property ownership in times of late homeownership: a new conceptual vocabulary," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 6-24, January.
    13. José Manuel Torrado & Ricardo Duque-Calvache & Isabel Palomares-Linares, 2020. "The demand-side determinants of multiple property ownership in Spain," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 120-143, January.
    14. Hang Kei Ho, 2020. "Inside the world of middle-class Hong Kong transnational property investors: ‘5980 miles to my second home’," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 75-99, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Peris & Laure Casanova Enault, 2024. "Proximity or opportunity? Spatial and market determinants of private individuals’ buy-to-let investments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1478-1495, September.
    2. Cody Hochstenbach & Richard Ronald, 2020. "The unlikely revival of private renting in Amsterdam: Re-regulating a regulated housing market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1622-1642, November.
    3. Rowan Arundel & Jose Manuel Torrado & Ricardo Duque-Calvache, 2024. "The spatial polarization of housing wealth accumulation across Spain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1686-1709, September.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:vstm4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Lisha He & Mia M Bennett & Ronghao Jiang, 2022. "The uneven geography of real estate investment by Mainland Chinese state-owned and private enterprises in the U.S.: Local market conditions, migration, and ethnic networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 653-675, June.
    6. Arkadiusz Jan Derkacz, 2025. "Short- and Long-Term Economic Cycles in the Renter-Occupied Housing Market: A Conceptual Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 541-551.
    7. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    8. Dallas Rogers & Sophia Maalsen & Peta Wolifson & Desiree Fields, 2024. "Proptech and the private rental sector: New forms of extraction at the intersection of rental properties and platform rentierisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(14), pages 2778-2794, November.
    9. Katsinas, Philipp, 2021. "Professionalisation of short-term rentals and emergent tourism gentrification in post-crisis Thessaloniki," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108590, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. George C Galster, 2024. "How digitalisation influences neighbourhood change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(16), pages 3028-3049, December.
    11. McGowan, Victoria J, 2026. "“Take away the greed of the private landlord housing market … because that is killing people”: Examining the political economy of housing and health inequalities in four English coastal towns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    12. Siddiki, Jalal, 2025. "Homeownership in the UK: The role of wealth inequality and family life cycles," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Paccoud, Antoine & Niesseron, Pauline & Mace, Alan, 2020. "The role of ethnic change in the closing of rent gaps through buy-to-let gentrification," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102985, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Rachel Ong ViforJ & William A.V. Clark & Susan J. Smith & Gavin A. Wood & William Lisowski & N.T. Khuong Truong & Melek Cigdem, 2021. "Tenure transitions at the edges of ownership: Reinforcing or challenging the status quo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1993-2011, November.
    15. Antoine Paccoud, 2020. "The top tail of the property wealth distribution and the production of the residential environment," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 100-119, January.
    16. Nygaard, Christian & van den Nouwelant, Ryan & Glackin, Stephen & Martin, Chris & Sisson, Alistair, 2022. "Filtering as a source of low-income housing in Australia: conceptualisation and testing," SocArXiv ph8as, Center for Open Science.
    17. Desiree Fields, 2024. "Digital Experiments with Landed Property: Robots, Race, and Rent," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(3), pages 329-345, July.
    18. Cody Hochstenbach, 2025. "How housing restructuring shapes social and tenurial inequalities in cumulative housing disadvantage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(7), pages 1002-1028, October.
    19. Tasos Kitsos & Max Nathan & Diana Gutiérrez-Posada, 2025. "Don’t Shoot the Pianist: Creative Firms, Workers, and Neighborhood Gentrification," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 101(1), pages 60-85, January.
    20. Nicole Cook & Kristian Ruming, 2021. "The financialisation of housing and the rise of the investor-activist," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2023-2039, August.
    21. Tim White & David Madden, 2024. "Housing ideology and urban residential change: The rise of co-living in the financialized city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(5), pages 1368-1384, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:6:p:757-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.