IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v57y2025i5p669-686.html

On the need for caution in using ‘big data’ for built environment research: A response to Chng et al. (2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Clifford

    (Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London, UK)

  • Patricia Canelas

    (Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK)

  • Richard Dunning

    (Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK)

  • Jessica Ferm

    (Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London, UK)

  • Nicola Livingstone

    (School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK)

  • Alex Lord

    (Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK)

Abstract

The study of the built environment is evolving with digital advancements and the emergence of a big data era, opening up new possibilities for planning practice and research. However, the integration of digital tools in research and practice calls for consideration of methodological questions. In this article, we compare two studies. One is our own ‘small data’ case study research and the other is a ‘big data’ approach recently published in this journal. Both studies discuss housing space standards – internal floorspace – in the context of a deregulated planning policy known in England as ‘permitted development’ (PD) relating to office-to-residential conversion schemes. Not only do these studies differ methodologically but also in results: our own case studies found that the majority of PD housing units do not meet recommended space standards. This finding is consistent with other in-depth studies on the same issue but is contradicted by the big data study that yielded different results. By reference to example conversion schemes, we argue that to understand the space standards issue, a more in-depth small data approach is more reliable than relying solely on secondary data sets and a big data approach. This illustrates a need for wider debate as to when big data is beneficial and when it can be misleading, particularly if being utilised to criticise evidence from alternate, more detailed data approaches. We conclude that it is crucial that academic discussions on different methodological approaches are conducted with respect, openness and transparency regarding the suitability of different approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Clifford & Patricia Canelas & Richard Dunning & Jessica Ferm & Nicola Livingstone & Alex Lord, 2025. "On the need for caution in using ‘big data’ for built environment research: A response to Chng et al. (2024)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(5), pages 669-686, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:5:p:669-686
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251331862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251331862
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X251331862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Gabriele Harten & Annette M Kim & J Cressica Brazier, 2021. "Real and fake data in Shanghai’s informal rental housing market: Groundtruthing data scraped from the internet," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1831-1845, July.
    2. Hardy, A. & Glew, D., 2019. "An analysis of errors in the Energy Performance certificate database," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1168-1178.
    3. Daniel Arribas-Bel & Jessie Bakens, 2019. "Use and validation of location-based services in urban research: An example with Dutch restaurants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 868-884, April.
    4. Jenkins, David & Simpson, Sophie & Peacock, Andrew, 2017. "Investigating the consistency and quality of EPC ratings and assessments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 480-489.
    5. Patricia Canelas & Ben Clifford & Jessica Ferm & Nicola Livingstone, 2022. "Hard, soft and thin governance spaces in land-use change: comparing office-to-residential conversions in England, Scotland and the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 725-743, April.
    6. James R. DeLisle & Brent Never & Terry V. Grissom, 2020. "The big data regime shift in real estate," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 363-395, May.
    7. Thomas W. Sanchez & Hannah Shumway & Trey Gordner & Theo Lim, 2023. "The prospects of artificial intelligence in urban planning," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 179-194, April.
    8. Jorge Iván Pérez-Rave & Juan Carlos Correa-Morales & Favián González-Echavarría, 2019. "A machine learning approach to big data regression analysis of real estate prices for inferential and predictive purposes," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 59-96, January.
    9. Lindsay Blair Howe, 2021. "Thinking through people: The potential of volunteered geographic information for mobility and urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 3009-3028, November.
    10. Jessica Ferm & Ben Clifford & Patricia Canelas & Nicola Livingstone, 2021. "Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2040-2058, August.
    11. Linnet Taylor, 2021. "The taming of chaos: Optimal cities and the state of the art in urban systems research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3196-3202, November.
    12. Phil Hubbard, 2025. "Small is beautiful? Making sense of ‘shrinking’ homes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(1), pages 187-203, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jon Bannister & Anthony O’Sullivan, 2021. "Big Data in the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3061-3070, November.
    2. Fernando Fernandez-Monge & Sarah Barns & Rainer Kattel & Francesca Bria, 2024. "Reclaiming data for improved city governance: Barcelona’s New Data Deal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1291-1307, May.
    3. Hettinga, Sanne & van ’t Veer, Rein & Boter, Jaap, 2023. "Large scale energy labelling with models: The EU TABULA model versus machine learning with open data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Jenny Crawley & Phillip Biddulph & Paul J. Northrop & Jez Wingfield & Tadj Oreszczyn & Cliff Elwell, 2019. "Quantifying the Measurement Error on England and Wales EPC Ratings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Shiva Amirkhani & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Anastasia Mylona & Paulina Godfrey & Darren Cook & Hooman Tahayori & Hexin Zhang, 2021. "Uncertainties in Non-Domestic Energy Performance Certificate Generating in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Ahlrichs, Jakob & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Häckel, Björn, 2022. "Impact of socio-economic factors on local energetic retrofitting needs - A data analytics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Li, Y. & Kubicki, S. & Guerriero, A. & Rezgui, Y., 2019. "Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Flavio Scrucca & Domenico Palladino, 2023. "Integration of Energy Simulations and Life Cycle Assessment in Building Refurbishment: An Affordability Comparison of Thermal Insulation Materials through a New Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Palladino, Domenico, 2023. "Energy performance gap of the Italian residential building stock: Parametric energy simulations for theoretical deviation assessment from standard conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    10. Gao, Feng & Bai, Zhaocheng & Wu, Jiemin & Chen, Zirui & Chen, Wangyang & Li, Guanyao & Liao, Shunyi, 2025. "Unraveling the consumer geography from the review big data: A supply-demand duality perspective using store density and expenditure intensity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    12. Camboni, Riccardo & Corsini, Alberto & Miniaci, Raffaele & Valbonesi, Paola, 2021. "Mapping fuel poverty risk at the municipal level. A small-scale analysis of Italian Energy Performance Certificate, census and survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Konstantinos Ferentinos & Alex Gibberd & Benjamin Guin, 2021. "Climate policy and transition risk in the housing market," Bank of England working papers 918, Bank of England.
    14. Ian Chng & Jonathan Reades & Phil Hubbard, 2024. "Planning deregulation as solution to the housing crisis: The affordability, amenity and adequacy of Permitted Development in London," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 961-978, May.
    15. Jakub Galuszka, 2022. "Transcending path dependencies: Why the study of post-socialist cities needs to capitalise on the discussion on urbanisation in the South (and vice versa)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(12), pages 2411-2430, September.
    16. Jenny Crawley & Despina Manouseli & Peter Mallaburn & Cliff Elwell, 2022. "An Empirical Energy Demand Flexibility Metric for Residential Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Elias Bjørgve & Are Oust & Arne Johan Pollestad & Cato Sandnes & Ole Jakob Sønstebø, 2026. "Comparing Housing Valuation Techniques and Stacked Generalization: Exploiting Explainable AI," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 640-665, April.
    18. repec:osf:socarx:8jbvg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Peiwei Cao & Xubiao He, 2024. "Machine Learning Solutions for Fast Real Estate Derivatives Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(4), pages 2003-2032, October.
    20. Renée Sieber & Ana Brandusescu & Suthee Sangiambut & Abigail Adu-Daako, 2025. "What is civic participation in artificial intelligence?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(6), pages 1388-1406, July.
    21. Ingrid Campo-Ruiz, 2025. "Artificial intelligence may affect diversity: architecture and cultural context reflected through ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Google Maps," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:5:p:669-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.