Author
Listed:
- Ling Li
(School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China)
- Yiru Tan
(School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China)
- Jianming Liang
(School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China)
- Pengjun Zhao
(School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China)
Abstract
A large-scale urban renewal programme in many Chinese cities has resulted in residential displacement, raising concerns about its negative consequences. However, quantitative evidence is scarce. Utilising mobile signalling data that records continuous individual movements, we devise a strategy for measuring mass displacement caused by urban renewals, where a large number of migrant tenants are forced to move at the same time. Focusing on multiple urban renewal projects in Shenzhen, a pioneer city in urban renewal practices in China, we estimate the effects of mass displacement on the living conditions of displaced residents using both a difference-in-differences approach and a machine learning approach. The results show that, compared with relocations unaffected by renewal, displaced residents relocated to areas with worse housing quality and poor access to urban amenities, and experienced longer commutes, the pattern of which is more severe for urban renewals in the central area of the city. The aggregate displacement indices derived from the support vector machine model indicate that 25% of the displaced experienced a worsening of living conditions following the relocation. Our findings suggest significant adverse consequences of mass displacement as a result of large-scale urban renewal.
Suggested Citation
Ling Li & Yiru Tan & Jianming Liang & Pengjun Zhao, 2025.
"Measuring mass displacement of urban renewal in Shenzhen, China: Using longitudinal mobile phone trajectory data,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(5), pages 635-651, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:5:p:635-651
DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251336904
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:5:p:635-651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.