Author
Listed:
- Ronghao Jiang
(Department of Social Sciences and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Ting Kok, Hong Kong)
- George CS Lin
(Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong)
Abstract
This research engages with ongoing debates over the global proliferation of culture-led urban redevelopments through a study that examines the pattern and process of culture-led redevelopment in China amidst profound regulatory changes. A systematic statistical analysis has found that the extent of culture-led redevelopment has little to do with the degree of marketisation, level of economic growth or concentration of creative human capital but is closely related to the pressure of central regulatory control over local urban land expansion. Municipalities with less quota for newly added urban land are found to be more proactive to leverage on the rhetoric of developing a cultural economy through the regeneration of old industrial land in the name of culture-led redevelopment for the hidden agenda of lucrative commercial developments. The extent of culture-led redevelopment tends to be higher in the cities where greater local administrative supports are made available for culture-led redevelopment projects to circumvent central regulations. Our study of the city of Guangzhou at a finer scale has shown that the bulk of culture-led redevelopment projects are masked superficially in the name of culture to serve the real interest in profitable commercial activities. Research findings challenge the popular perception of culture-led urban redevelopment as a reasonable and legitimate strategy of place making/promotion and bring to the fore regulatory and regime changes in the state-economy-politics arena as an important lens to understand the sophisticated dynamics and diverse trajectories of urban transformations in China and beyond.
Suggested Citation
Ronghao Jiang & George CS Lin, 2025.
"The drunkard’s intention lies not on the wine: Reinterpreting culture-led urban redevelopment in China amidst profound regime changes,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(2-3), pages 241-268, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:2-3:p:241-268
DOI: 10.1177/0308518X241309492
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:2-3:p:241-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.