IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v52y2020i4p688-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fighting coronavirus at home: Visualizing “slammers†for the extended Spring Festival break in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangping Zhou

    (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Yuling Yang

Abstract

The beginning of 2020 has seen coronavirus spreading to many countries and regions. To contain the virus, China adopted, arguably, the most stringent quarantine countermeasures in the country’s history concerning restricting people flows, limiting outdoor activities, and extending the Spring Festival break. On the one hand, thousands of doctors and nurses directly fought and are still fighting coronavirus in various medical facilities; on the other hand, millions and even billions of residents and tourists self-quarantined and are still self-quarantining themselves in their homes (or temporary homes), fighting the virus in another manner. Across cities and regions, which have the highest percentage of “fighters†at home? To answer this, we downloaded and processed the publicly available Baidu Qianxi (migration) data for 11 consecutive days in 2019 and 2020. Then we geovisualized the answer. The visual indicates that several cities in Hubei, as expected, had the highest percentage, followed by several cities in Zhejiang Province and several cities in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Hainan Province. In terms of percentage ranking across regions, East China is no.1.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangping Zhou & Yuling Yang, 2020. "Fighting coronavirus at home: Visualizing “slammers†for the extended Spring Festival break in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 688-690, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:688-690
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20922236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X20922236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X20922236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:688-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.