IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v48y2016i11p2116-2128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voting out of the European Union: Exploring the geography of Leave

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Harris
  • Martin Charlton

Abstract

On Thursday 23 June 2016, a majority of the UK electorate voted in favour of leaving the European Union by a margin of 51.9% to 48.1%. Throughout the night, as the results were reported, the media spoke about London, Scotland and Northern Ireland versus the rest of the UK in regard to their support for the European Union. In this commentary, we look at the geographical distribution of the share of the Leave votes and model it against the share of the electorate, by local authority and by region, using a multilevel framework. The model identifies differences between countries and differences between regions but also more localised variations that depart from those trends. Areas with an older population were more likely to attract a higher share of the Leave vote, as were those with higher proportions of residents in lower supervisory and technical occupations, and with residents born outside of the UK but in the European Union. The referendum has revealed a less than United Kingdom, with notable differences between Scotland, Northern Ireland and much of London, and parts of the East Midlands, West Midlands and the East. However, London is not as pro-European Union as might be anticipated given its social, ethnic and demographic composition, which may help explain why the Leave campaign won with a small margin.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Harris & Martin Charlton, 2016. "Voting out of the European Union: Exploring the geography of Leave," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2116-2128, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:48:y:2016:i:11:p:2116-2128
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16665844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X16665844
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X16665844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Rudkin & Lucy Barros & Paweł Dłotko & Wanling Qiu, 2024. "An economic topology of the Brexit vote," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 601-618, March.
    2. Stephen Clark, 2020. "Who voted for a No Deal Brexit? A Composition Model of Great Britains 2019 European Parliamentary Elections," Papers 2001.06548, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:48:y:2016:i:11:p:2116-2128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.