IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v42y2010i10p2393-2409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immanent Politics: Thinking Race and Ethnicity through Affect and Machinism

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Lim

    (School of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, England)

Abstract

In this paper, I attempt to rethink race and ethnicity through Deleuzo–Guattarian conceptions of affect and machinism. Considered in the context of a theorisation of machinism, affect might be thought of as not only underwriting difference and contingency, but as simultaneously affording the potential for bodies to be organised into proper relations. I suggest an understanding of the virtual as impure, full of bundles of potential functions, an understanding that allows us to envisage race and ethnicity in terms of virtual memory and the incipient organisation of affect. I also argue that thinking of race and ethnicity in terms of affect requires a theorisation of machinism. Race and ethnicity thus have to be considered in terms of historically specific sociomaterial assemblages that are at once practised and productive. Building upon these insights, and taking inspiration from the writings of Elizabeth Grosz, I propose a vision of an antiracist politics that pursues justice by other means than a politics of recognition or resistance. Instead, I suggest that antiracist struggles need to harness the subliminal and superliminal forces that produce the conditions for affect, subjectivity, and action. This is a politics that seeks to free desire from its historically specific organisation, but which attends to its own reinvestment in racialising and ethnicising tendencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Lim, 2010. "Immanent Politics: Thinking Race and Ethnicity through Affect and Machinism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(10), pages 2393-2409, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:10:p:2393-2409
    DOI: 10.1068/a42234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a42234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:10:p:2393-2409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.