IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v36y2004i1p173-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Governance and Environmental Conservation: Gravel Politics and the Preservation of an Endangered Bird Species in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Shui-Yan Tang

    (School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0626, USA)

  • Ching-Ping Tang

    (Department of Political Science, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Min-Hsiung, 621, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

Despite its many promises, devolved governance may pose great challenges to environmental conservation, especially in the context of newly democratized polities where local communities tend to be dominated by place-bound clientele networks that pursue developmental interests at the expense of conservation. In this paper the authors examine how a conservation movement in Huben Village of Yunlin County in Taiwan has successfully been organized to save the endangered bird species Fairy Pitta ( Pitta nuymphia ) against gravel extraction activities that were backed by local clientele networks of politicians and business interests. The case illustrates how challenges of devolved governance can be addressed not necessarily by centralized authority but by connecting grassroots victims of environmental degradation with broader conservation movements supported by networks of civic organizations that transcend narrow geographical interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Shui-Yan Tang & Ching-Ping Tang, 2004. "Local Governance and Environmental Conservation: Gravel Politics and the Preservation of an Endangered Bird Species in Taiwan," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 173-189, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:1:p:173-189
    DOI: 10.1068/a3661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jieming Zhu, 1999. "Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China’s Gradualist Urban Land Reforms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 534-548, September.
    2. Gavin Bridge & Andrew E G Jonas, 2002. "Governing Nature: The Reregulation of Resource Access, Production, and Consumption," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 759-766, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang Bum Ju & Shui-Yan Tang, 2011. "External Legitimacy, Goal Congruence and Collective Resistance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 811-825, March.
    2. Brian Ilbery & Gunjan Saxena, 2009. "Evaluating ‘Best Practice’ in Integrated Rural Tourism: Case Examples from the England-Wales Border Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(9), pages 2248-2266, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siu Wai Wong & Bo-sin Tang & Jinlong Liu & Ming Liang & Winky K.O. Ho, 2021. "From “decentralization of governance†to “governance of decentralization†: Reassessing income inequality in periurban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1473-1489, September.
    2. Siyi Chen & Zhigang Chen & Yan Shen, 2021. "Can improving law enforcement effectively curb illegal land use in China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Lu, Shenghua & Wang, Hui, 2023. "How revolving-door recruitment makes firms stand out in land market: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Remus Creţan & Lucian Vesalon, 2017. "The Political Economy of Hydropower in the Communist Space: Iron Gates Revisited," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(5), pages 688-701, October.
    5. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Yongshen Liu & Yung Yau, 2020. "Urban Entrepreneurialism Vs Market Society: The Geography of China's Neoliberal Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 266-288, March.
    7. Guowen Dai, 2015. "The impact of policy networks on the urbanisation around High-Speed Railway stations in China: the case of Wuhan," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(3), pages 533-551, June.
    8. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    9. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    10. Danielle Labbé & Clement Musil, 2014. "Periurban Land Redevelopment in Vietnam under Market Socialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1146-1161, May.
    11. Evangelia Apostolopoulou & John D Pantis, 2010. "Development Plans versus Conservation: Explanation of Emergent Conflicts and State Political Handling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 982-1000, April.
    12. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    13. Natacha Aveline-Dubach, 2017. "Centrality of Land in the Capital Accumulation Regime in China [La centralité du foncier dans le régime d’accumulation du capital en Chine]," Post-Print halshs-01556558, HAL.
    14. Anne Haila, 2009. "Chinese Alternatives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 572-575, June.
    15. Bin Li & Chaoqun Liu, 2018. "Emerging selective regimes in a fragmented authoritarian environment: The ‘three old redevelopment’ policy in Guangzhou, China from 2009 to 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1400-1419, May.
    16. Yakun Zhang & Wenzhe Tang & Colin F. Duffield & Lihai Zhang & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2021. "Environment Management of Hydropower Development: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Shiuh-Shen Chien, 2008. "The Isomorphism of Local Development Policy: A Case Study of the Formation and Transformation of National Development Zones in Post-Mao Jiangsu, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 273-294, February.
    18. Gavin Shatkin, 2014. "Contesting the Indian City: Global Visions and the Politics of the Local," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Yu, Yang & Hamnett, Chris & Ye, Yumin & Guo, Wenwen, 2021. "Top-down intergovernmental relations and power-building from below in China's urban redevelopment: An urban political order perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Maureen G Reed, 2007. "Uneven Environmental Management: A Canadian Comparative Political Ecology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 320-338, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:1:p:173-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.