Author
Listed:
- P L Mokhtarian
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis 95616, USA)
- I Salomon
(Department of Geography, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel)
Abstract
In this paper a conceptual model of the individual decision to telecommute is presented. Key elements of that decision, including constraints, facilitators, and drives, are defined and the relationships among them described. The major types of constraints (if negative) or facilitators (if positive) include external factors related to awareness, the organization, and the job, and internal psychosocial factors. The major types of drives are work, family, leisure, ideology, and travel. It is argued that the absence of constraints is a necessary but not sufficient condition for telecommuting to be adopted by an individual. The presence of one or more drives, assumed to be associated with some dissatisfaction, is necessary to activate the search for a solution to that dissatisfaction. The choice set contains those alternative solutions perceived to be feasible by the individual. It may or may not contain telecommuting (depending on whether all constraints are nonbinding or not), and probably contains other alternatives having nothing to do with telecommuting. Each alternative is evaluated in terms of how effectively it satisfies the drive, and the individual's attitudes toward it. The alternative (or bundle of alternatives) which maximizes individual utility becomes the preferred behavioral pattern. However, short-term constraints may prevent the preferred behavior from being chosen. The process is a dynamic one, in which previous choices affect attitudes and constraints and alter drives. Work directed by the authors is under way to operationalize the conceptual model.
Suggested Citation
P L Mokhtarian & I Salomon, 1994.
"Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: Setting the Context,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(5), pages 749-766, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envira:v:26:y:1994:i:5:p:749-766
DOI: 10.1068/a260749
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt8rg5f9s8 is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt4zc486ph is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt1096f8wt is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt0km7985p is not listed on IDEAS
- R. Gregson, 1963.
"Some possible forms of lexicographic evaluation,"
Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(2), pages 173-183, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:26:y:1994:i:5:p:749-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.