IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v47y2023i1p17-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating Stakeholder Legitimacy in the Eyes of Stakeholders: The Case of Havana’s Paladares

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Alvarez
  • Arielle Badger Newman
  • Jay Barney
  • Alexander Plomaritis

Abstract

In desperation for survival, the Cuban government legalized limited forms of self-employment in the fall of 1993, and the Paladar industry (in home restaurants) was born and their numbers proliferated. For the next 25 years, the state oscillated between legalizing entrepreneurship to outright forbidding it; yet, the paladares thrived. This work explores and documents how different stakeholder evaluations of legitimacy of an entrepreneurial endeavor change over time and how these endeavors shape stakeholder’s evaluations of legitimacy. Utilizing archival data, in addition to firsthand interviews with various stakeholders, this paper documents key stakeholder evaluations of legitimacy in an endeavor’s context, the differences in these evaluations, how they change over time, and how these endeavors responded to and shaped these conflicts. The endeavors in our context shaped stakeholder views of legitimacy in ways that enabled them to gain access to the resources they needed to survive and prosper. This work brings a nuanced understanding of how stakeholders evaluate the legitimacy of entrepreneurial endeavors in contexts that are changing and emerging and how these evaluations are co-created in an iterative process between stakeholders and the endeavor.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Alvarez & Arielle Badger Newman & Jay Barney & Alexander Plomaritis, 2023. "Creating Stakeholder Legitimacy in the Eyes of Stakeholders: The Case of Havana’s Paladares," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 17-65, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:17-65
    DOI: 10.1177/10422587211020673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10422587211020673
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10422587211020673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:47:y:2023:i:1:p:17-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.