IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v37y2026i6p3245-3267.html

Balancing act: The role of risk, cost, benefit, and opportunity in green energy decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Kuo Cheng Chung
  • Szu-Yu Kuo
  • Zong-Min Xie

Abstract

This research examines the strategic development and progress of green energy initiatives on offshore islands under the auspices of the Chinese government. The primary methodologies employed are the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory and the analytic network process, in conjunction with the VIKOR method. The analysis focuses on four primary dimensions: benefits, opportunities, costs, risks, and their respective subdimensions. Results indicate the need to consider risk first, followed by cost, benefit, and opportunity. They also underscore the importance of the government focusing on risk management and cost-effectiveness when implementing green energy infrastructure. Subsequently, the potential benefits and opportunities should be evaluated to enhance the effectiveness of green energy systems in Taiwan's offshore islands and ensure optimal operational efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuo Cheng Chung & Szu-Yu Kuo & Zong-Min Xie, 2026. "Balancing act: The role of risk, cost, benefit, and opportunity in green energy decision making," Energy & Environment, , vol. 37(6), pages 3245-3267, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:6:p:3245-3267
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X251315406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X251315406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X251315406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:37:y:2026:i:6:p:3245-3267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.