Author
Listed:
- Rashi Tyagi
- Raya Bhattacharjya
- Pankaj Kumar Singh
- Abhishek Saxena
- Thomas Kiran Marella
- Rajesh Prasad Rastogi
- Archana Tiwari
Abstract
The study explores the impact of different organic carbon sources and agricultural fertilizers on the growth and metabolite production of marine benthic diatom Cylindrotheca sp. The results revealed that the highest cell density was recorded in the cultures supplied with urea (1 g L −1 ), which was 1.9% more than the control. The protein content was increased (1.75%) in the cultures treated with different C and N sources compared to the control. The total chlorophyll and carotenoid content was highest in the cultures with 1.5 g L −1 sucrose (25 ± 0.33 mg g −1 ) and 0.5 g L −1 glucose (10.25 ± 0.13 mg g −1 ), respectively. Further, the fatty acid profile reveals that total MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acids) was maximum in sucrose at 1.5 g L −1 (45.63%) followed by control (31.25%). C22:5 (Docosapentaenoic acid) was found to be maximum in sucrose 1.5 g L −1 (6.98%) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was maximum in glycerol 1.5 g L −1 (14.37%). Thus, based on the results, it can be inferred that since different nutrients have varying effects on diatom growth and biomolecule production, this study can aid in selecting a suitable upstream approach based on the desired downstream application. The study provides pioneering evidence on how specific nutrient combinations (e.g., urea, sucrose, glucose) optimize the production of biomolecules such as MUFA and PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids), which have high value in nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries.
Suggested Citation
Rashi Tyagi & Raya Bhattacharjya & Pankaj Kumar Singh & Abhishek Saxena & Thomas Kiran Marella & Rajesh Prasad Rastogi & Archana Tiwari, 2025.
"Sustainable cultivation of Cylindrotheca sp. using organic carbon and nitrogen sources for enhanced biomass and metabolite production,"
Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(7), pages 3151-3165, November.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:7:p:3151-3165
DOI: 10.1177/0958305X251354913
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:7:p:3151-3165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.