IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i4p1824-1848.html

Can industrial agglomeration affect biodiversity loss?

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Xing
  • Shuhong Wang

Abstract

Reducing the rate of species extinction and protecting biodiversity are major international concerns. The loss of biodiversity is closely related to international trade as an inevitable result of industrial agglomeration and improvements in green economy efficiency. In contrast to previous studies on biodiversity loss from the perspectives of deforestation, hunting, and fire, this study examines biodiversity loss from an international trade perspective, calculates the biodiversity footprint of each country as an indicator of biodiversity loss, and innovatively elaborates on the theoretical mechanisms of industrial agglomeration, green economy efficiency, and biodiversity loss. An empirical analysis used panel data from 148 countries from 2006 to 2020. This study identifies that industrial agglomeration directly and indirectly aggravates biodiversity loss through green economy efficiency, which mediates the relationship between industrial agglomeration and biodiversity loss. The effects of industrial agglomeration and green economy efficiency on biodiversity loss driven by export trade in developed and developing countries are consistent with the benchmark test results. The effect of industrial agglomeration on green economy efficiency is positive in developed countries and vice versa in developing countries. By region, green economy efficiency can significantly mitigate the embodied biodiversity loss in the export trade in Asia, Africa, and North America, whereas its influence in Europe and North America is insignificant. This study extends the perspective of biodiversity research from the natural to economic fields, delves into the underlying economic causes of the current state of trade-driven biodiversity loss, and provides important evidence for reducing biodiversity losses caused by international trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Xing & Shuhong Wang, 2025. "Can industrial agglomeration affect biodiversity loss?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(4), pages 1824-1848, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1824-1848
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231200575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231200575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231200575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moinul Islam & Keiichiro Kanemoto & Shunsuke Managi, 2016. "Impact of Trade Openness and Sector Trade on Embodied Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Air Pollutants," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(3), pages 494-505, June.
    2. Chaudhary, Abhishek & Brooks, Thomas M., 2019. "National Consumption and Global Trade Impacts on Biodiversity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 178-187.
    3. Fabio Grazi & Jeroen Bergh & Piet Rietveld, 2007. "Spatial welfare economics versus ecological footprint: modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 38(1), pages 135-153, September.
    4. Wang, Jianda & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How does ICT agglomeration affect carbon emissions? The case of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Tokimatsu, Koji & Konishi, Satoshi & Ishihara, Keiichi & Tezuka, Tetsuo & Yasuoka, Rieko & Nishio, Masahiro, 2016. "Role of innovative technologies under the global zero emissions scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1483-1493.
    6. Florian Zabel & Ruth Delzeit & Julia M. Schneider & Ralf Seppelt & Wolfram Mauser & Tomáš Václavík, 2019. "Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Ping Lu & Jianhui Liu & Yunxuan Wang & Lei Ruan, 2021. "Can industrial agglomeration improve regional green total factor productivity in China? An empirical analysis based on spatial econometrics," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1011-1039, June.
    8. Shen, Neng & Peng, Hui, 2021. "Can industrial agglomeration achieve the emission-reduction effect?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. M. Lenzen & D. Moran & K. Kanemoto & B. Foran & L. Lobefaro & A. Geschke, 2012. "International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 109-112, June.
    10. Martin, Philippe & Rogers, Carol Ann, 1995. "Industrial location and public infrastructure," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 335-351, November.
    11. Cai, Jie & Stoyanov, Andrey, 2016. "Population aging and comparative advantage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalmey, Tim & Meya, Jasper & Sager, Lutz, 2025. "Biodiversity Engel Curves: Estimating how income and inequality shape consumption-driven biodiversity loss," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-041, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Mengqi Gong & Gege He & Yizi Wang & Yiyue Yang & Xinru Li, 2025. "Collaborative Industrial Agglomeration and a Green Low-Carbon Circular Development Economy: A Study Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Wang, Qunwei, 2023. "How does heterogeneous industrial agglomeration affect the total factor energy efficiency of China's digital economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    4. Xuemei Li & Suisui Chen & Shuhong Wang, 2024. "Economic growth, government efficiency, and biodiversity loss: an international trade perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30901-30927, December.
    5. Vačkářová, Davina & Medková, Helena & Krpec, Petr & Weinzettel, Jan, 2023. "Ecosystem services footprint of international trade: Economic value of ecosystem services lost due to crop production," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Ayberk Şeker & Mahmut Kadir İşgüven, 2025. "The Nexus Between Biodiversity and Sovereign Credit Ratings: Global Environmental and Economic Interdependencies from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Fabio Grazi (AFD) & Henri WAISMAN & Jeroen van DEN BERGH, 2017. "A Simple Model of Agglomeration Economies with Environmental Externalities," Working Paper 6123ba60-086f-4618-9df3-a, Agence française de développement.
    8. Wang, Jianda & Guo, Dongsheng, 2023. "Siphon and radiation effects of ICT agglomeration on green total factor productivity: Evidence from a spatial Durbin model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Amanda Irwin & Arne Geschke & Johan P. Mackenbach, 2024. "The Biodiversity Impact of Health Care: Quantifying the Extinction-Risk Footprint of Health Care in The Netherlands and Other European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Anhui Guo & Limin Han & Shan Zheng, 2024. "How does industrial agglomeration affect green innovation efficiency in high-tech industries?—Evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30771-30796, December.
    11. Paradis, Emmanuel, 2021. "Forest gains and losses in Southeast Asia over 27 years: The slow convergence towards reforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Thomas Wiedmann, 2017. "An input–output virtual laboratory in practice – survey of uptake, usage and applications of the first operational IELab," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 296-312, April.
    13. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    14. Colin Davis, 2013. "Regional integration and innovation offshoring with occupational choice and endogenous growth," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 59-79, January.
    15. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Kristian Behrens & Carl Gaigné, 2006. "Developing the "outermost regions" of Europe: some lessons from economic geography," Working Papers hal-02285630, HAL.
    17. Camelia Romocea-Turcu, 2008. "Regional disparities in industry location and income: a footloose capital model," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 28(2), pages 145-177, September.
    18. Behrens, Kristian & Gaigne, Carl & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2007. "Countries, regions and trade: On the welfare impacts of economic integration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 1277-1301, July.
    19. Qiuzhen Ren & Jinkai Li & Johan Albrecht, 2025. "Toward circular economy: Implementing circular economy strategies to reduce carbon emissions in Chinese cities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 914-931, January.
    20. Picard, Pierre M. & Toulemonde, Eric, 2006. "Firms agglomeration and unions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 669-694, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1824-1848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.