IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i3p1462-1483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the process of urbanization good for efficiency in the construction industry: Applying the SBM-DEA model based on energy use and CO2 emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Nuo Lin
  • Yung-Ho Chiu
  • Tai-Yu Lin
  • I-Fang Lin
  • Tzu-Han Chang
  • Shu-Mei Wang

Abstract

This research employs the modified undesirable slack-based measure dynamic exogenous data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the construction industry efficiency in 30 provinces of China from 2006 to 2017. It considers the differences in urbanization levels in three (east, central, west) regions and evaluates the profitability, resource allocation, energy consumption, and carbon emission efficiency of the construction industry. The results are as follows. First, the construction industry efficiency is the best in the east, followed by the central region, and lowest in the west. Second, the changing trends in this industry's efficiency are widespread across the nation's regions. The highest point of efficiency in the east region is at the beginning of the research period, but it then declines. The efficiency value of the central region reaches its peak around 2012 and then falls. The west region experiences increasing efficiency year-by-year until peaking in 2017. Third, depending on the degree of urbanization, its effects are also diverse. Therefore, the China government must examine the degree of urbanization to avoid environmental problems brought by urbanization that can bring about a drop in efficiency of the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Nuo Lin & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin & I-Fang Lin & Tzu-Han Chang & Shu-Mei Wang, 2025. "Is the process of urbanization good for efficiency in the construction industry: Applying the SBM-DEA model based on energy use and CO2 emissions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(3), pages 1462-1483, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1462-1483
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231192356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231192356
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231192356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1462-1483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.