IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i3p1409-1442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the carbon emissions trading scheme improve the corporate environmental information disclosure level? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Peilun Li
  • Huilin Zhang
  • Caiting Yang
  • Jiafeng Zhang

Abstract

Recently, a great deal of literature has discussed the effects of the carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) and the factors that affect the corporate environmental information disclosure (CEID) level. However, no researchers have studied how CETS affects the CEID level. Based on a difference-in-difference-in-differences model, we discover that CETS can improve the CEID level. The findings are robust and persistent even after testing for time lags and leads effects, changing the measure of the dependent variable, testing for enterprise relocation, adjusting the fixed effect method, testing for concurrent policies, and performing placebo tests. The reason is that CETS can encourage corporate green technology innovation and environmental protection investment, thus improving the CEID level. Further investigation reveals that the impact of CETS on promoting the CEID level is more significant when the following conditions are met: the enterprises are in provinces and cities in the east and northeast; they are state-owned; and they have strong political connections. This paper expands on the current field of research on the influence effects of CETS, broadens the understanding of the factors influencing the CEID level, and investigates the mechanism by which CETS improves the CEID level.

Suggested Citation

  • Peilun Li & Huilin Zhang & Caiting Yang & Jiafeng Zhang, 2025. "Does the carbon emissions trading scheme improve the corporate environmental information disclosure level? Evidence from China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(3), pages 1409-1442, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1409-1442
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231195363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231195363
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231195363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1409-1442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.