IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i3p1290-1308.html

Evaluating carbon payback time by optimizing insulation materials for different orientations: A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Rafat Gigasari
  • Javier Cárcel-Carrasco
  • Luis Manuel Palmero Iglesias
  • Nima Amani

Abstract

The European Union aims to reduce greenhouse gases emissions by 80–95% compared to 1990 levels by 2050. Therefore the life cycle concept has gained widespread acceptance as a model for evaluating the environmental impact of goods and services. In this study, the optimal thickness of various insulation materials for external walls, roofs, and floors using a Mediterranean climate zone's hot summers and mild winters for a hypothetical residential building for four cardinal orientations was determined. The criteria for determining the optimum thickness represent a turning point in terms of cooling energy consumption (electricity). The optimum thickness of nine different types of insulation materials was defined using the aforementioned approach. These materials included aerogel, polyisocyanurate, polyurethane, extruded polystyrene, expanded polystyrene, phenolic foam, cellulose fiber (cellulose), mineral wool, and glass wool (GW). The purpose of this paper is to calculate the carbon payback time (CPBT) using the cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment method by considering the global warming potential (GWP) of insulation materials at their optimum thickness. The CPBT is calculated as the ratio of the total building's GWP to the GWP of savings from cooling and heating (electricity and natural gas). The results indicated that when evaluating the average CPBT for four cardinal orientations (FCO), aerogel has the longest CPBT of 2.34 years, and GW has the shortest CPBT of just 0.09 years. Aside from cost payback time, the findings of this study provide a new perspective on selecting appropriate thermal insulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Rafat Gigasari & Javier Cárcel-Carrasco & Luis Manuel Palmero Iglesias & Nima Amani, 2025. "Evaluating carbon payback time by optimizing insulation materials for different orientations: A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(3), pages 1290-1308, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1290-1308
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231193871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231193871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231193871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abanda, F.H. & Byers, L., 2016. "An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 517-527.
    2. García-Gusano, Diego & Garraín, Daniel & Dufour, Javier, 2017. "Prospective life cycle assessment of the Spanish electricity production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 21-34.
    3. Storlie, Curtis B. & Helton, Jon C., 2008. "Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: Description of techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 28-54.
    4. Berardi, Umberto, 2019. "The impact of aging and environmental conditions on the effective thermal conductivity of several foam materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 777-794.
    5. Schiavoni, S. & D׳Alessandro, F. & Bianchi, F. & Asdrubali, F., 2016. "Insulation materials for the building sector: A review and comparative analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 988-1011.
    6. Richard Plevin & Mark Delucchi & Felix Creutzig, 2014. "Response to Comments on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation …”," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 468-470, May.
    7. Dickson, T. & Pavía, S., 2021. "Energy performance, environmental impact and cost of a range of insulation materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Mehmet Kadri Akyüz & Önder Altuntaş & Mehmet Ziya Söğüt, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Optimization of an Airport Terminal Building’s Wall and Roof Insulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Axaopoulos, Ioannis & Axaopoulos, Petros & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Kalogirou, Soteris & Gelegenis, John, 2015. "Optimal economic thickness of various insulation materials for different orientations of external walls considering the wind characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 939-952.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hawks, M.A. & Cho, S., 2024. "Review and analysis of current solutions and trends for zero energy building (ZEB) thermal systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    2. Guo, Haijin & Cai, Shanshan & Li, Kun & Liu, Zhongming & Xia, Lizhi & Xiong, Jiazhuang, 2020. "Simultaneous test and visual identification of heat and moisture transport in several types of thermal insulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Ye, Fengyang & Wei, Hanlin & Xiao, Yan & Berardi, Umberto & Quaranta, Giuseppe & Demartino, Cristoforo, 2025. "Bio-based insulation materials in sustainable constructions: A review of environmental, thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and mechanical performances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Shin, Bigyeong & Chang, Seong Jin & Wi, Seunghwan & Kim, Sumin, 2023. "Estimation of energy demand and greenhouse gas emission reduction effect of cross-laminated timber (CLT) hybrid wall using life cycle assessment for urban residential planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. di Filippo, Rocco & Maracchini, Gianluca & Albatici, Rossano & Di Maggio, Rosa & Bursi, Oreste S., 2025. "A novel prescriptive approach for buildings’ insulation design considering embodied carbon," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Benedetti Miriam & Herce Carlos & Sforzini Matteo & Susca Tiziana & Toro Claudia, 2024. "Defining a sustainable supply chain for buildings Off-Site envelope thermal insulation solutions: proposal of a methodology to investigate opportunities based on a context analysis," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 38-57.
    7. Jinhui Ma & Haijing Huang & Mingxi Peng & Yihuan Zhou, 2024. "Investigating the Heterogeneity Effects of Urban Morphology on Building Energy Consumption from a Spatio-Temporal Perspective Using Old Residential Buildings on a University Campus," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Helton, Jon C. & Johnson, Jay D. & Sallaberry, Cédric J., 2011. "Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Example analyses from reactor safety and radioactive waste disposal involving the separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1014-1033.
    9. Jiang, Wei & Jin, Yang & Liu, Gongliang & Li, Qing & Li, Dong, 2023. "Passive nearly zero energy retrofits of rammed earth rural residential buildings based on energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Daina Paulikas & Steven Katona & Erika Ilves & Saleem H. Ali, 2022. "Deep‐sea nodules versus land ores: A comparative systems analysis of mining and processing wastes for battery‐metal supply chains," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2154-2177, December.
    11. Rongrong Yu & Ning Gu & Michael J. Ostwald, 2022. "Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Cai, Shanshan & Guo, Haijin & Zhang, Boxiong & Xu, Guowen & Li, Kun & Xia, Lizhi, 2020. "Multi-scale simulation study on the hygrothermal behavior of closed-cell thermal insulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Cong Li & Yajuan Zhou & Manfei Wu & Jiayue Xu & Xin Fu, 2025. "Exploring Nonlinear Threshold Effects and Interactions Between Built Environment and Urban Vitality at the Block Level Using Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Arianne Provost‐Savard & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2024. "Substitution modeling can coherently be used in attributional life cycle assessments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 410-425, June.
    15. Stefano Cascone & Gianpiero Evola & Antonio Gagliano & Gaetano Sciuto & Chiara Baroetto Parisi, 2019. "Laboratory and In-Situ Measurements for Thermal and Acoustic Performance of Straw Bales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Jie, Pengfei & Yan, Fuchun & Li, Jing & Zhang, Yumei & Wen, Zhimei, 2019. "Optimizing the insulation thickness of walls of existing buildings with CHP-based district heating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Artur Koper & Karol Prałat & Justyna Ciemnicka & Katarzyna Buczkowska, 2020. "Influence of the Calcination Temperature of Synthetic Gypsum on the Particle Size Distribution and Setting Time of Modified Building Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    18. So-Young Lee & Myoung-Won Oh, 2020. "Sustainable Design Alternatives and Energy Efficiency for Public Rental Housing in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Ben Amor & Pierre Blanchet, 2018. "Evaluating the Link between Low Carbon Reductions Strategies and Its Performance in the Context of Climate Change: A Carbon Footprint of a Wood-Frame Residential Building in Quebec, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:3:p:1290-1308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.