IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/emffin/v24y2025i2p243-268.html

Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Disclosures in Fulfilling Stakeholders’ Information Needs: A Thematic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vismaya Gangadharan
  • Lakshmi Padmakumari
  • Vijayalakshmi C. Balasubramaniam

Abstract

The main objective of any capital market regulatory system is to improve information transparency. Corporate disclosures, which include both financial and narrative information, are the most reliable sources for this purpose. Clear presentation of such information helps reduce information asymmetry. This study examines the themes in the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) sections of annual reports for financial sector companies in 2017–2018 and compares them with the Jenkins report (1991) recommendations to improve nonfinancial disclosures. The study investigates whether these themes meet users’ information requirements and finds that the MD&A sections often fail to provide the necessary forward-looking information and management analysis of firm and segment performance. Additionally, the readability of the reports does not significantly enhance the fulfillment of users’ information needs. The study also explores whether the themes in the MD&A differ based on firm performance and finds a positive relationship between the disclosure of business descriptions, financial information, management and shareholder information, and firm value. Given these unmet information needs, the research highlights the importance of establishing a governance system to ensure the quality of corporate disclosures. JEL Codes: G14, G2, G34

Suggested Citation

  • Vismaya Gangadharan & Lakshmi Padmakumari & Vijayalakshmi C. Balasubramaniam, 2025. "Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Disclosures in Fulfilling Stakeholders’ Information Needs: A Thematic Analysis," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 24(2), pages 243-268, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:emffin:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:243-268
    DOI: 10.1177/09726527241312976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09726527241312976
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09726527241312976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajiv D. Banker & Raj Mashruwala, 2007. "The Moderating Role of Competition in the Relationship between Nonfinancial Measures and Future Financial Performance," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 763-793, September.
    2. Lo, Kin & Ramos, Felipe & Rogo, Rafael, 2017. "Earnings management and annual report readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-25.
    3. Khalid Alsaeed, 2006. "The association between firm‐specific characteristics and disclosure," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 476-496, June.
    4. Xuelian Bai & Yi Dong & Nan Hu, 2019. "Financial report readability and stock return synchronicity," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 346-363, January.
    5. Vivien Beattie & Bill McInnes & Stella Fearnley, 2004. "A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 205-236, September.
    6. Amir, Eli & Lev, Baruch, 1996. "Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 3-30, October.
    7. Jameson, Melvin & Prevost, Andrew & Puthenpurackal, John, 2014. "Controlling shareholders, board structure, and firm performance: Evidence from India," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1643-1671, August.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:02686900610667256 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vismaya Gangadharan & Lakshmi Padmakumari, 2024. "Fogging the firm performance: an empirical examination of the annual report readability in India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 211-226, June.
    11. Reem Fraih Alshiban & Khalid Rasheed Al-Adeem, 2022. "Empirically Investigating the Disclosure of Nonfinancial Information: A Content Study on Corporations Listed in the Saudi Capital Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    13. Aditya Banerjee & Sayantan Kundu, 2024. "Does Public Sentiment Impact Stock Price Movements? Evidence from India," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 23(1), pages 108-134, March.
    14. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. M. R. K. Samarakoon & R. K. Mishra & Rudra P. Pradhan & Manju Jayakumar & Tapan P. Bagchi, 2025. "Annual report readability, ESG disclosure, and risk perspectives of Indian firms: the mediating role of corporate governance and earnings management," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 678-705, September.
    2. Chung, Dennis Y. & Hrazdil, Karel & Novak, Jiri & Suwanyangyuan, Nattavut, 2019. "Does the large amount of information in corporate disclosures hinder or enhance price discovery in the capital market?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 36-52.
    3. Sang Jun Cho & Changhwan Choi & Chune Young Chung, 2024. "Firm information and risk: Evidence from the role of 10‐K report readability," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 488-507, April.
    4. Vismaya Gangadharan & Lakshmi Padmakumari, 2024. "Fogging the firm performance: an empirical examination of the annual report readability in India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 211-226, June.
    5. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    6. Chen, Chen & Hanlon, Dean & Khedmati, Mehdi & Wake, James, 2023. "Annual report readability and equity mispricing," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    7. Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir & Boubaker, Sabri & Ding, Xiaoya (Sara), 2021. "Annual report readability and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Ibrahim El-Sayed Ebaid, 2023. "IFRS adoption and the readability of corporate annual reports: evidence from an emerging market," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    10. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Samarakoon, S.M.R.K. & Wijesinghe, B.A.C.H. & Maradana, Rana P., 2025. "Clear or confusing? How financial report readability and tone are associated with dividend payouts in Indian corporations," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Soliman, Marwa & Ben-Amar, Walid, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility orientation and textual features of financial disclosures," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Huang, Winifred & Yang, Min, 2025. "Innovation and annual report readability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    13. Kuo Zhou & Xianghui Jin & Xinru Li & Yunqing Tao, 2024. "Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 274-291, January.
    14. Peng Hu & Xuming Li & Nian Li & Yiying Wang & Derek D. Wang, 2024. "Peeking into Corporate Greenwashing through the Readability of ESG Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Cao, Qilin & Ren, Qian & Wang, Wenke & Ren, Mengxi & Jia, Haochen, 2025. "Can readability of the ESG report alleviate rating divergence?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Jessica H. Yang & Siwen Liu, 2017. "Accounting narratives and impression management on social media," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 673-694, September.
    17. Lebelle, Martin & Lajili Jarjir, Souad & Sassi, Syrine, 2022. "The effect of issuance documentation disclosure and readability on liquidity: Evidence from green bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    18. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    19. Drago, Carlo & Ginesti, Gianluca & Pongelli, Claudia & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2018. "Reporting strategies: What makes family firms beat around the bush? Family-related antecedents of annual report readability," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 142-150.
    20. Minxing Sun & Weike Xu, 2024. "Short selling and readability in financial disclosures: A controlled experiment," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 265-292, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:emffin:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:243-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ifmr.ac.in .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.