IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v27y2026i2p249-278.html

Filtering out Euroskepticism: Media influence and interpersonal communication in an agent-based model of Brexit opinion dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Isabela Zeberio
  • Theresa Kuhn
  • Iñaki Ucar

Abstract

Why do heavily biased media campaigns sometimes fail to achieve expected persuasive effects in electoral contexts? While compelling at the national level, the argument that pro-Leave media bias explains Brexit outcome struggles to account for places such as London and other urban areas, where majorities voted Remain despite exposure to Euroskeptic media. To shed light on this puzzle, this article applies the “filter hypothesis†to examine how interpersonal communication mediates media effects. We extend this framework by incorporating group pressure mechanisms simulating opinion conformity, and building an agent-based model that compares theoretical mechanisms: direct versus mediated media effects, varying conformity levels, and different thresholds for network homogeneity and opinion similarity perception. Our findings show that models incorporating both mediated effects and group pressure mechanisms best replicate observed voting patterns and improve explanatory power.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabela Zeberio & Theresa Kuhn & Iñaki Ucar, 2026. "Filtering out Euroskepticism: Media influence and interpersonal communication in an agent-based model of Brexit opinion dynamics," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(2), pages 249-278, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:249-278
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165261424664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165261424664
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165261424664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:2:p:249-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.