IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i4p729-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why does gender inequality in academic publishing persist? Lessons and recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Hagemann

Abstract

Data from leading scholarly journals and publishing houses show that the gender gap in academic publishing is deep and persistent. This has considerable consequences for individual careers and for academic knowledge across disciplines. As European political science journals have started to publish their gender data for submissions and publication processes, this article evaluates this trend and the conclusions from a recent symposium on ‘The gendered distribution of authors and reviewers in major European political science journals’. It summarises a list of ‘key gender data’ that journal editors are encouraged to publish on an annual basis to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive picture for individual journals and across the discipline. It also includes suggestions for editors to ensure better citations of female scholars in their journals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Hagemann, 2022. "Why does gender inequality in academic publishing persist? Lessons and recommendations," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(4), pages 729-740, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:729-740
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221120773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221120773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221120773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:729-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.