IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i4p680-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is this crisis different? Attitudes towards EU fiscal transfers in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Haverland

    (Department of Public Administration and Sociology, 6984Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Reinout van der Veer

    (Department of Political Science, 6029Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Michal Onderco

    (Department of Public Administration and Sociology, 6984Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Peace Research Center Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic)

Abstract

To mitigate the enormous and asymmetric economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU has adopted an unprecedented €750 billion fiscal transfer programme, financed by joint member state liabilities. The highly contested decision pitted ‘frugal’ northern member states against ‘profligate’ southern member states. However, do citizens from northern countries view EU transfers as unfavourably as their governmental positions suggest? This article focuses on the crucial case of the Netherlands, whose government has become the assertive leader of the ‘frugal’ coalition. We test COVID-19 specific explanations based on a large-scale survey conducted at the height of the pandemic. Our analysis suggests that citizens who experience the non-material health and social effects of the pandemic more directly are more supportive of fiscal transfers than those to whom the pandemic is more abstract, whereas those who experience negative financial effects and those who believe that COVID-19 is a conspiracy are less supportive.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Haverland & Reinout van der Veer & Michal Onderco, 2022. "Is this crisis different? Attitudes towards EU fiscal transfers in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(4), pages 680-699, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:680-699
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221112988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221112988
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221112988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:4:p:680-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.