IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v9y1995i1p94-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income Inequality and Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Nancey Green Leigh

    (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Abstract

This review essay examines the economic development field's approach to the issue of income inequality—an issue that is one of the field's greatest and most enduring challenges. Only academic (or policy and research) circles pay much attention to the measurement of income inequality, and this essay reviews four recent book-length treatments of the subject. These books demonstrate that this attention tends to be greatest at the national level and rare at the local level. There is a need to instill a general concern over the issue of inequality at the local and practitioner levels of economic development as the trends of recent decades reviewed here document increasing income inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancey Green Leigh, 1995. "Income Inequality and Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 9(1), pages 94-103, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:9:y:1995:i:1:p:94-103
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249500900111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249500900111
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249500900111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terry F. Buss & Laura C. Yancer, 1999. "Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Normative Perspective," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 13(1), pages 29-37, February.
    2. Susan E. Cozzens & Kamau Bobb, 2003. "Measuring the relationship between high technology development strategies and wage inequality," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 351-368, October.
    3. John C. Leatherman & David W. Marcouiller, 1999. "Moving Beyond the Modeling of Regional Economic Growth: A Study of How Income is Distributed to Rural Households," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 13(1), pages 38-45, February.
    4. J. C. Dissart, 2003. "Regional Economic Diversity and Regional Economic Stability: Research Results and Agenda," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 423-446, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:9:y:1995:i:1:p:94-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.