IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v6y1992i2p173-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attributes of Development Tools: Success and Failure in Local Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Pagano

    (Miami University)

  • Ann O'M. Bowman

    (University of South Carolina)

Abstract

This article examines the attributes of local economic development policy instruments and asks whether these attributes can predict (1) project success as defined in archival data and in interviews of city officials, and (2) revenue generation as defined in conventional return on investment terms. Based on our analyses of quantitative and qualitative data from 40 city-supported development projects nationwide, the lesson for development projects designed or supported because of their revenue-generating potential appears to be that the city's economic condition is an important predictor of the revenue-generating success of a project. Further, the less complicated and the more routine or standard the bundle of incentives offered (especially by economically healthy cities), the greater the probability of revenue-generating success. Project success, however, is related to other factors. The more controversial the project, the more likely that down the road, the city will have an unsuccessful development project on its hands. Knowing the political risk of a project aids in predicting the success of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Pagano & Ann O'M. Bowman, 1992. "Attributes of Development Tools: Success and Failure in Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 6(2), pages 173-186, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:6:y:1992:i:2:p:173-186
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249200600206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249200600206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249200600206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:6:y:1992:i:2:p:173-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.