IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v6y1992i1p52-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Labor Cost Differences on the Location of Economic Activity under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Roberts

    (Michigan State University)

  • Phillip R. Smith

    (Michigan State University)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare compensation costs for Canadian and U.S. workers to evaluate how relative compensation costs may affect firm location decisions with the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Labour Division of Statistics Canada, the major findings were that compensation costs for U.S. labor were consistently higher than for Canadian labor; and, that despite apparent Canadian preferences for social insurance, U.S. nonwage compensation was also higher. Higher U.S. costs persisted after allowing for large shifts in the exchange rate except in retail trade. When differences in labor productivity were incorporated, the Canadian cost advantage disappeared except in wholesale trade. Major conclusions were that cost differences will motivate firms to locate distribution centers on the Canadian side of the border; and, that socialization of medical costs in Canada will increase pressure for restructuring financing of health insurance in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Roberts & Phillip R. Smith, 1992. "The Effect of Labor Cost Differences on the Location of Economic Activity under the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 6(1), pages 52-63, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:6:y:1992:i:1:p:52-63
    DOI: 10.1177/089124249200600105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089124249200600105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/089124249200600105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:6:y:1992:i:1:p:52-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.