IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v40y2026i2p179-186.html

Yes, There is an Economic Consensus That Professional Sports Facilities are Inadvisable Public Investments: A Reply to Johnson, Fort, and Rosentraub

Author

Listed:
  • John Charles Bradbury
  • Brad R. Humphreys

Abstract

In a recent issue of Economic Development Quarterly , Johnson et al. took issue with the contention that there is a strong scholarly consensus that professional sports facilities are not advisable public investments. Johnson et al. argued that opinion surveys of economists may be flawed, research reaches somewhat ambiguous conclusions, and that existing reviews of academic literature do not provide a balanced assessment of the evidence. Thus, Johnson et al. concluded that a judicious policy approach requires weighing the costs and benefits of individual stadium projects. This reply evaluates these claims and demonstrates that they do not have merit; therefore, it is accurate to describe the academic consensus as generally opposed to public underwriting of professional sports venues.

Suggested Citation

  • John Charles Bradbury & Brad R. Humphreys, 2026. "Yes, There is an Economic Consensus That Professional Sports Facilities are Inadvisable Public Investments: A Reply to Johnson, Fort, and Rosentraub," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(2), pages 179-186, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:179-186
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424261418035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424261418035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424261418035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Z28 - Other Special Topics - - Sports Economics - - - Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:179-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.