IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v40y2026i2p158-168.html

Eminent Domain Takings and Economic Development: The Effect of State Restrictions on Metropolitan Area Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Paul F. Byrne

Abstract

The Supreme Court's Kelo decision upheld local governments’ right to use eminent domain in furtherance of an economic development plan under the premise that their public purpose includes the jobs and tax revenue generated by such developments. Following Kelo , 21 states effectively banned economic development as a justification for eminent domain condemnations. Whereas previous research examined the impact of eminent domain restrictions at the state level, this paper's focus is at the metropolitan-area level, where the inefficient underassembly of property that eminent domain is meant to correct is most acute. Difference-in-differences methods found that metropolitan areas in states that restrict the use of eminent domain experience statistically significant negative treatment effects on employment and earnings following the restrictions. As four Supreme Court justices have indicated a willingness to reconsider Kelo , these findings provide further insight into the economic assumptions supporting the ruling.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul F. Byrne, 2026. "Eminent Domain Takings and Economic Development: The Effect of State Restrictions on Metropolitan Area Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(2), pages 158-168, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:158-168
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424261426897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424261426897
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424261426897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:158-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.