IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v40y2026i1p10-26.html

Building Inclusive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Institutional Motivations, Adaptive Design, and Partnership Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Sua Kim
  • Qingfang Wang
  • Scott Taylor
  • Michael Seley

Abstract

This study examines how a multicity initiative supporting minority-owned or women-owned businesses organizes inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystems to address persistent market failures. Using a triangulated qualitative research design, the study asks what configuration of problem recognition, organizational motivations, and partnering pathways explain engagement, and with what returns. Findings show that organizations participate based on both mission alignment and anticipated benefit, structuring their efforts through existing relationships and coordinated roles across management, capital, and market access. Partnerships serve as delivery mechanisms and as settings for institutional learning, yielding ecosystem level outcomes alongside internal adjustments toward inclusive and culturally responsive practice. The study advances a market failure approach to ecosystem design and identifies the mechanisms that connect organizational intent to sustained engagement. The findings inform flexible design strategies, role alignment, and culturally grounded implementation for policy makers, funders, and ecosystem practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Sua Kim & Qingfang Wang & Scott Taylor & Michael Seley, 2026. "Building Inclusive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Institutional Motivations, Adaptive Design, and Partnership Impacts," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 40(1), pages 10-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:10-26
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251393689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251393689
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251393689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:10-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.