IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v39y2025i4p261-266.html

States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Chaaron Pearson
  • Alison Wakefield
  • Logan Timmerhoff
  • Elizabeth Gray
  • Jeff Chapman

Abstract

Each year, states collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on tax incentive programs. Despite being states’ largest investment in economic development, research from The Pew Charitable Trusts found in 2012 that no state regularly and rigorously evaluated the effectiveness of incentives. This left policy makers with very little information to guide decision making. Since 2012, there has been a sea change: More than two-thirds of states and several major cities now regularly produce high quality evaluations of their major incentives, using rigorous and creative methods to measure impact. Pew's research both informed and followed this shift in the field. In addition to assessing the effects of incentives, these evaluations also provide a wealth of valuable information on how to design more effective incentives. As a result, policy makers are better informed and capitalize on the new information as they launch, continue, modify, or repeal programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaaron Pearson & Alison Wakefield & Logan Timmerhoff & Elizabeth Gray & Jeff Chapman, 2025. "States Take the Lead in Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 39(4), pages 261-266, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:261-266
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251378378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251378378
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251378378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:261-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.