IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v39y2025i3p167-181.html

City Competition for E-Commerce Sales Tax Revenue: Qualitative Evidence on the Politics of Land Fiscalization in California

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Schmahmann

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of the growth in e-commerce and the landmark Wayfair ruling on the politics of land fiscalization in California. Through analysis of city revenue data, the author demonstrates that sales tax revenue for cities with a concentration of e-commerce distribution warehouses has increased substantially since the Wayfair ruling. In California, online retailers, such as Amazon, are required to pay sales tax to a local jurisdiction based on the location of the fulfillment center. Several cities in California have utilized tax incentives to attract e-commerce companies to their jurisdiction. Tension between cities that benefit from these new sales tax regulations and those that feel disadvantaged by it has emerged, raising broader questions regarding regional inequality. Achieving an equitable distribution of sales tax revenue remains a challenge for states with an origin-based local sales tax (such as California) as well as states with a destination-based local sales tax.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Schmahmann, 2025. "City Competition for E-Commerce Sales Tax Revenue: Qualitative Evidence on the Politics of Land Fiscalization in California," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 39(3), pages 167-181, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:167-181
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251331896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251331896
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251331896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schragger, Richard C., 2016. "City Power: Urban Governance in a Global Age," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190246662.
    2. Whitney B. Afonso, 2019. "The Barriers Created by Complexity: A State-by-State Analysis of Local Sales Tax Laws in Light of the Wayfair Ruling," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 72(4), pages 777-800, December.
    3. Timothy J. Bartik, 2020. "Using Place-Based Jobs Policies to Help Distressed Communities," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 99-127, Summer.
    4. Timothy J. Bartik, 2019. "Making Sense of Incentives: Taming Business Incentives to Promote Prosperity," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number msi.
    5. Jensen, Nathan M., 2017. "Job creation and firm-specific location incentives," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 85-112, March.
    6. Robert W. Wassmer, 2002. "Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1307-1327, July.
    7. David R. Agrawal & Iuliia Shybalkina, 2024. "Remittance Rules and the Distribution of Local Tax Revenue: Evidence after Wayfair," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(4), pages 813-831.
    8. John L. Mikesell & John D. Stavick & Justin M. Ross, 2023. "Use tax administration and revenue production in the states," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 24-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aycan Katitas & Sonal Pandya, 2024. "Investment incentives attract foreign direct investment: evidence from the great recession," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 323-345, July.
    2. Donghyuk Kim, 2023. "Interjurisdictional Competition and Coordination: Evidence from Kansas City," NBER Chapters, in: Policy Responses to Tax Competition, pages 215-231, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Randall Akee & Maggie R. Jones & Emilia Simeonova, 2025. "Place Based Economic Development and Tribal Casinos," Working Papers 25-24, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Nicholas Kacher & Luke Petach, 2021. "Boon or Burden? Evaluating the Competing Effects of House-Price Shocks on Regional Entrepreneurship," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(4), pages 287-304, November.
    5. Jakub Statucki & Klaudia Hilebrandt-Szymanska, 2024. "Factors Influencing the Choice of New Location for Paper Packaging Manufacturers Serving Direct Food Contact Markets in the Modern Era," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 228-237.
    6. Whitney B. Afonso & Jeremy G. Moulton, 2024. "Local sales tax exportation: The impact of commuters, tourists, and college students on the tax base," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 38-59, March.
    7. Smith, V. Kerry, 2021. "A note on income inequality at the state level," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Freedman, Matthew & Khanna, Shantanu & Neumark, David, 2023. "Combining rules and discretion in economic development policy: Evidence on the impacts of the California Competes Tax Credit," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Andrew Hanson & Shawn Rohlin, 2024. "Local employment multipliers for large publicly subsidized firms: Evidence from a synthetic control approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 491-526, March.
    10. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    11. Kitchens, Carl & Wallace, Cullen T., 2022. "The impact of place-based poverty relief: Evidence from the Federal Promise Zone Program," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Bathelt, Harald & Buchholz, Maximilian & Storper, Michael, 2024. "The nature, causes, and consequences of inter-regional inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123014, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Wassmer, Robert W., 2016. "Further empirical evidence on residential property taxation and the occurrence of urban sprawl," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 73-85.
    14. O'Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2022. "Retail sprawl and CO2 emissions: Retail centres in Irish cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Brett Theodos & Christina Stacy & Daniel Teles & Chris Davis & Ananya Hariharan, 2022. "Place‐based investment and neighborhood change: The impacts of New Markets Tax Credits on jobs, poverty, and neighborhood composition," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1092-1121, September.
    16. Matilde Bombardini & Andres Gonzalez-Lira, 2024. "The Increasing Cost of Buying American," CESifo Working Paper Series 11339, CESifo.
    17. Manon Garrouste & Miren Lafourcade, 2022. "Place-Based Policies: Opportunity for Deprived Schools or Zone-and-Shame Effect?," Post-Print hal-04329793, HAL.
    18. Jacob Bundrick & Weici Yuan, 2019. "Do Targeted Business Subsidies Improve Income and Reduce Poverty? A Synthetic Control Approach," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 351-375, November.
    19. Fetzer, Thiemo & Edenhofer, Jacob & Garg, Prashant, 2025. "Local decline and populism," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    20. Thiess Büttner, 2021. "Land Use and Fiscal Competition," CESifo Working Paper Series 8958, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:167-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.