IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v39y2025i3p167-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City Competition for E-Commerce Sales Tax Revenue: Qualitative Evidence on the Politics of Land Fiscalization in California

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Schmahmann

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of the growth in e-commerce and the landmark Wayfair ruling on the politics of land fiscalization in California. Through analysis of city revenue data, the author demonstrates that sales tax revenue for cities with a concentration of e-commerce distribution warehouses has increased substantially since the Wayfair ruling. In California, online retailers, such as Amazon, are required to pay sales tax to a local jurisdiction based on the location of the fulfillment center. Several cities in California have utilized tax incentives to attract e-commerce companies to their jurisdiction. Tension between cities that benefit from these new sales tax regulations and those that feel disadvantaged by it has emerged, raising broader questions regarding regional inequality. Achieving an equitable distribution of sales tax revenue remains a challenge for states with an origin-based local sales tax (such as California) as well as states with a destination-based local sales tax.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Schmahmann, 2025. "City Competition for E-Commerce Sales Tax Revenue: Qualitative Evidence on the Politics of Land Fiscalization in California," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 39(3), pages 167-181, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:167-181
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424251331896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424251331896
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424251331896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:167-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.