IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v39y2025i2p124-135.html

Rethinking the Urban–Rural Divide: Economic Growth in America's Heartland

Author

Listed:
  • Marley Randazzo
  • Elizabeth Currid-Halkett

Abstract

Recent economic development literature and popular media tend to describe rural America as mired in a state of socioeconomic decay, unable to break the vicious cycle kicked off by deindustrialization and sustained by brain drain. However, an emerging body of literature challenges these totalizing views, emphasizing the need for greater attention and nuance in rural economic research. This commentary adds to this topic, examining sector employment data over the 1991–2020 period by metropolitan and rural geographies to assess economic development in the nation's Heartland. Overall, the authors find surprising job growth rates in knowledge industries more typically associated with cities and urban agglomerations. In addition, this commentary strengthens existing findings that the nature of official metropolitan classifications erodes rural economic vitality and contributes to pervasive “left behind†narratives.

Suggested Citation

  • Marley Randazzo & Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, 2025. "Rethinking the Urban–Rural Divide: Economic Growth in America's Heartland," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 39(2), pages 124-135, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:124-135
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424241310872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424241310872
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424241310872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura B. Nolan & Jane Waldfogel & Christopher Wimer, 2017. "Long-Term Trends in Rural and Urban Poverty: New Insights Using a Historical Supplemental Poverty Measure," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 672(1), pages 123-142, July.
    2. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jorge De La Roca & Diego Puga, 2017. "Learning by Working in Big Cities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(1), pages 106-142.
    4. Edward L. Glaeser & Joshua D. Gottlieb, 2006. "Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(8), pages 1275-1299, July.
    5. Michael Storper & Anthony J. Venables, 2004. "Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-370, August.
    6. José D. Pacas & David W. Rothwell, 2020. "Why is Poverty Higher in Rural America According to the Supplemental Poverty Measure? An Investigation of the Geographic Adjustment," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(5), pages 941-975, October.
    7. Daniel T. Lichter & James P. Ziliak, 2017. "The Rural-Urban Interface: New Patterns of Spatial Interdependence and Inequality in America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 672(1), pages 6-25, July.
    8. Kenneth M. Johnson & Daniel T. Lichter, 2020. "Metropolitan Reclassification and the Urbanization of Rural America," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(5), pages 1929-1950, October.
    9. John Crabtree, 2016. "A Different Path for Rural America," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 605-622, May.
    10. Allen J. Scott, 2022. "The constitution of the city and the critique of critical urban theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1105-1129, May.
    11. Elizabeth Seale, 2013. "Coping Strategies of Urban and Rural Welfare Organisations and the Regulation of the Poor," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 141-170, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Tom Mueller & Matthew M. Brooks & José D. Pacas, 2022. "Cost of Living Variation, Nonmetropolitan America, and Implications for the Supplemental Poverty Measure," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1501-1523, August.
    2. Kristoffer Moeller, 2018. "Culturally clustered or in the cloud? How amenities drive firm location decision in Berlin," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 728-758, September.
    3. Biermann, Marcus, 2024. "Remote talks: Changes to economics seminars during COVID-19," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Silke Hamann & Annekatrin Niebuhr & Duncan Roth & Georg Sieglen, 2023. "How does the Covid‐19 pandemic affect regional labor markets and why do large cities suffer most?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(5), pages 1228-1250, November.
    5. Ian R. Gordon, 2015. "Ambition, Human Capital Acquisition and the Metropolitan Escalator," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 1042-1055, June.
    6. Paul Verstraten, 2018. "The scope of the external return to higher education," CPB Discussion Paper 381.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Jessie P. H. Poon & Christine A. Lai, 2008. "Why are Non-profit Performing Arts Organisations Successful in Mid-sized US Cities?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(11), pages 2273-2289, October.
    8. Tanaka, Kiyoyasu, 2023. "What hinders digital communication? Evidence from foreign firms in Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Lukas Kuld & Sara Mitchell & Christiane Hellmanzik, 2021. "Manhattan Transfer: Productivity effects of agglomeration in American authorship," Trinity Economics Papers tep0821, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    10. Paul Verstraten, 2018. "The scope of the external return to higher education," CPB Discussion Paper 381, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Glaeser, Edward & Ma, Yueran & Tobio, Kristina, 2017. "What is different about urbanization in rich and poor countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 17-49.
    12. Nathan, Max, 2007. "The Wrong Stuff? Creative Class Theory and Economic Performance in UK Cities," MPRA Paper 29486, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Stefano Magrini & Alessandro Spiganti, 2024. "A tale of two cities: Communication, innovation, and divergence," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(1), pages 390-413, January.
    14. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Giua, Mara & Rigo, Davide, 2022. "How many jobs can be done at home? Not as many as you think!," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117523, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Meng Wang & Yaoqiu Kuang & Ningsheng Huang, 2015. "Sustainable Urban External Service Function Development for Building the International Megalopolis in the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Chengri Ding & Zhi Li, 2022. "City Size and Household Consumption in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Jeroen van der Waal, 2013. "Cultural Amenities and Unemployment in Dutch Cities: Disentangling a Consumerist and Productivist Explanation for Less-educated Urbanites’ Varying Unemployment Levels across Urban Economies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(14), pages 2869-2885, November.
    18. Liu, Sitian & Su, Yichen, 2022. "The Effect of Working from Home on the Agglomeration Economies of Cities: Evidence from Advertised Wages," MPRA Paper 113108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Simona Iammarino & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 273-298.
    20. Cox, Gary W. & Figueroa, Valentin, 2025. "Agglomeration and creativity in early modern Britain," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:124-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.