Holding Their Feet to the Fire
This article focuses on four policies that a number of cities are using to make businesses more accountable for the development subsidies that they receive (costâ€“benefit analysis, effectiveness measurement, performance agreements, and clawback clauses). Using data from International City Management Associationâ€™s 2009 Economic Development Survey supplemented with Census Bureau data, three explanations for variation in city governmentsâ€™ adoption of these policies are tested: economic need, governmental capacity, and political context. The results reveal very limited support for economic needâ€“type explanations while strongly underscoring the importance of governmental capacity. Further, stark contrast with existing work on the topic, political context is shown to be important in multiple respects: The existence of lower class opportunity regimes and citizen opposition are both strongly linked with the use of at least two of these accountability policies, but this is conditioned by the cityâ€™s form of government.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:26:y:2012:i:2:p:138-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publishing)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.