IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v18y2004i2p168-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Technology Transfer and Business Development Potential: Technology Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Martin
  • Robert R. Gruetzmacher
  • Ryan Lanham
  • Joshua Brady

Abstract

This article presents a methodology that university technology transfer practitioners can employ to improve interactions with corporations that have active intellectual property management programs. The methodology provides a means for packaging university intellectual property in ways that align with core competencies of corporations and is designed to maintain consistency with the mission, ethics, and organizational practices of both large corporations and research universities. For historical and organizational reasons, intellectual property at universities tends to be developed in discrete units that are, in turn, licensed as discrete units—usually based on a patent. The authors call this model one-off licensing. Although widely practiced, one-off licensing may diminish the university’s ability to realize the full potential of its intellectual property. Enhanced value results when several pieces of related intellectual property are grouped together. Synergistic groupings of intellectual property also enhance the ability of universities to spin out successful contributions to business formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Martin & Robert R. Gruetzmacher & Ryan Lanham & Joshua Brady, 2004. "Assessing Technology Transfer and Business Development Potential: Technology Cluster Analysis," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(2), pages 168-173, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:18:y:2004:i:2:p:168-173
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242403261088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242403261088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242403261088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:18:y:2004:i:2:p:168-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.