IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crmide/v12y2025i1p66-84.html

Between Modernization Theory and Orientalism: The Question of Modernity in the Study of Iranian and Turkish Nationalisms

Author

Listed:
  • Yavuz TüyloÄŸlu

Abstract

The ongoing gulf between generalist social science disciplines and specialist area studies—where the former is associated with theoretical knowledge and the latter with the secondary role of producing descriptive information—informs the study of Middle Eastern nationalisms. This article’s specific references are to Iranian and Turkish nationalisms. “Theoretical poverty†of their specialized literature partly follows from and arises in response to the subordinate role the area studies are allocated and, equally importantly, how the subfields of Iranian Studies and Turkish Studies have developed within this setting. To demonstrate this claim, the article reviews relevant scholarship regarding the modernity of nations. This comparative analysis reveals that the contrasting ways the question of modernity is answered are a symptom of the differing development trajectories of Iranian and Turkish Studies as branches of Middle East Studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yavuz TüyloÄŸlu, 2025. "Between Modernization Theory and Orientalism: The Question of Modernity in the Study of Iranian and Turkish Nationalisms," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 12(1), pages 66-84, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:66-84
    DOI: 10.1177/23477989241309694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477989241309694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477989241309694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Nederveen Pieterse, 1991. "Dilemmas of Development Discourse: The Crisis of Developmentalism and the Comparative Method," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 22(1), pages 5-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    2. Rosario Espinal, 1992. "Development, Neoliberalism and Electoral Politics in Latin America," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 27-48, October.
    3. Cheryl McEwan, 2001. "Postcolonialism, feminism and development: intersections and dilemmas," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 1(2), pages 93-111, April.
    4. Dixon, Keith & Gaffikin, Michael, 2014. "Accounting practices as social technologies of colonialistic outreach from London, Washington, et Cetera," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 683-708.
    5. David Simon, 2003. "Dilemmas of development and the environment in a globalizing world: theory, policy and praxis," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(1), pages 5-41, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:66-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.