IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v42y2025i6p603-623.html

A paradox of ethnic politics? Minority language recognition and political trust in an authoritarian setting

Author

Listed:
  • Sevinç Öztürk

    (Department of Management and Organization, 187434Bitlis Eren University, Turkey)

  • Aykut Öztürk

Abstract

Does a state's increased use of a minority language affect the political attitudes of minorities using that language? To explore the impact of minority language recognition on minority individuals’ political attitudes, we conducted an online survey experiment in Turkey, recruiting citizens of Kurdish origin. Our results point to a recognition paradox. While Kurdish people in Turkey become more satisfied with state services when these services are provided in the Kurdish language, this satisfaction does not increase trust in state institutions. On the other hand, the recognition of the minority language further increases demands for policies regarding that ethnic language.

Suggested Citation

  • Sevinç Öztürk & Aykut Öztürk, 2025. "A paradox of ethnic politics? Minority language recognition and political trust in an authoritarian setting," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 603-623, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:603-623
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942241292201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942241292201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942241292201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pool, Jonathan, 1991. "The Official Language Problem," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(2), pages 495-514, June.
    2. Nils-Christian Bormann & Lars-Erik Cederman & Manuel Vogt, 2017. "Language, Religion, and Ethnic Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(4), pages 744-771, April.
    3. Michael Kumove, 2022. "Does Language Foster Reconciliation? Evidence From the Former Yugoslavia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 783-808, May.
    4. Ioannis N. Grigoriadis & Z. Aslı Elitsoy, 2021. "Inside Outsiders: Comparing State Policies Towards Citizens of Palestinian and Kurdish Descent in Israel and Turkey," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 750-767, September.
    5. Pérez, Efrén O. & Tavits, Margit, 2019. "Language Heightens the Political Salience of Ethnic Divisions," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 131-140, July.
    6. Seda Demiralp & Evren Balta, 2021. "Defeating Populists: The Case of 2019 Istanbul Elections," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Victor Ginsburgh & Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín & Shlomo Weber, 2005. "Disenfranchisement In Linguistically Diverse Societies: The Case Of The European Union," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(4), pages 946-965, June.
    8. Jan Delhey, 2007. "Do Enlargements Make the European Union Less Cohesive? An Analysis of Trust between EU Nationalities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 253-279, June.
    9. Mesut Yeğen & Uğraş Ulaş Tol & Mehmet Ali Çalışkan, 2020. "Ethnicity and Elections in Eastern Turkey: What do the Kurds Want?," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 7(4), pages 446-463, December.
    10. Paul Collier & Anke Hoeffler, 2004. "Greed and grievance in civil war," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 56(4), pages 563-595, October.
    11. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:253-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Liu, Amy H. & Gandhi, Jennifer & Bell, Curtis, 2018. "Minority Languages in Dictatorships: A New Measure of Group Recognition," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 639-660, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Kumove, 2022. "Does Language Foster Reconciliation? Evidence From the Former Yugoslavia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 783-808, May.
    2. Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2020. "The Economics of Language," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(2), pages 348-404, June.
    3. Jean Gabszewicz & Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2011. "Bilingualism and Communicative Benefits," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 271-286.
    4. Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2016. "Linguistic Diversity, Standardization, and Disenfranchisement: Measurement and Consequences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/277407, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Castañeda Dower, Paul & Ginsburgh, Victor & Weber, Shlomo, 2017. "Colonial legacy, polarization and linguistic disenfranchisement: The case of the Sri Lankan War," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 440-448.
    6. Yuki Kazuhiro, 2022. "Is Bilingual Education Desirable in Multilingual countries?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 889-949, October.
    7. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Weber, Shlomo, 2022. "The measurement of the value of a language," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Yuki, Kazuhiro, 2024. "Language education and economic outcomes in a bilingual society," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Paul Castaneda Dower & Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2014. "Colonial Legacy, Linguistic Disenfranchisement and the Civil Conflict in Sri Lanka," Working Papers 2014-011, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    10. Meirav Mishali-Ram & Jonathan Fox, 2022. "Is governmental and societal discrimination against Muslim minorities behind foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(2), pages 122-135, March.
    11. Metin M. Coşgel & Thomas J. Miceli & Sadullah Yıldırım, 2023. "Religion, rulers, and conflict," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 439-480, September.
    12. Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2013. "Linguistic diversity, standardization and disenfranchisement. Measurement and consequences," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/152436, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Victor Ginsburgh, 2008. "Multilingualism," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/7296, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Seitz, William Hutchins, 2016. "Stock market reactions to conflict diamond trading restrictions and controversies," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 63-84, April.
    15. Halvor Mehlum & Karl Moene & Ragnar Torvik, 2006. "Institutions and the Resource Curse," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(508), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Robert MacCulloch & Silvia Pezzini, 2010. "The Roles of Freedom, Growth, and Religion in the Taste for Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 329-358, May.
    17. Indra de Soysa & Synøve Almås, 2019. "Does Ethnolinguistic Diversity Preclude Good Governance? A Comparative Study with Alternative Data, 1990‐2015," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 604-636, November.
    18. Kjetil Bjorvatn & Mohammad Reza Farzanegan, 2014. "Resource Rents, Power, and Political Stability," CESifo Working Paper Series 4727, CESifo.
    19. Marktanner Marcus & Makdisi Samir, 2008. "Development against All Odds? The Case of Lebanon," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 101-133, September.
    20. Thiemo Fetzer & Samuel Marden, 2017. "Take What You Can: Property Rights, Contestability and Conflict," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 757-783, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:6:p:603-623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.