IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v42y2025i3p288-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From participation to provision: How civil society secures procedural rights through peace negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Sam R Bell

    (12292University at Buffalo, SUNY, USA)

  • Risa Kitagawa

    (1848Northeastern University, USA)

Abstract

Civil society inclusion in peace processes has many positive externalities, but does inclusion lead to improved rights for civil society actors themselves? We theorize how civil society actors leverage peace processes to secure state commitments to an improved advocacy environment after conflict. Using new data on civil society participation in peace negotiations (1990–2020), we show that participation significantly increases the likelihood of a provision formalizing these actors’ procedural rights in the resulting peace agreement. This relationship is conditional on relatively low pre-agreement repression of civil society, suggesting a minimal threshold of freedoms for effective advocacy during negotiations. Civil society actors in conflict settings may allocate scarce advocacy resources to secure procedural protections of their post-conflict survival, not only principled outcomes. Our findings suggest a possible mechanism allowing civil society to influence longer-term policy outcomes after conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam R Bell & Risa Kitagawa, 2025. "From participation to provision: How civil society secures procedural rights through peace negotiations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(3), pages 288-307, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:288-307
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942241255195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942241255195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942241255195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:288-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.