IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v42y2025i3p288-307.html

From participation to provision: How civil society secures procedural rights through peace negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Sam R Bell

    (12292University at Buffalo, SUNY, USA)

  • Risa Kitagawa

    (1848Northeastern University, USA)

Abstract

Civil society inclusion in peace processes has many positive externalities, but does inclusion lead to improved rights for civil society actors themselves? We theorize how civil society actors leverage peace processes to secure state commitments to an improved advocacy environment after conflict. Using new data on civil society participation in peace negotiations (1990–2020), we show that participation significantly increases the likelihood of a provision formalizing these actors’ procedural rights in the resulting peace agreement. This relationship is conditional on relatively low pre-agreement repression of civil society, suggesting a minimal threshold of freedoms for effective advocacy during negotiations. Civil society actors in conflict settings may allocate scarce advocacy resources to secure procedural protections of their post-conflict survival, not only principled outcomes. Our findings suggest a possible mechanism allowing civil society to influence longer-term policy outcomes after conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam R Bell & Risa Kitagawa, 2025. "From participation to provision: How civil society secures procedural rights through peace negotiations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(3), pages 288-307, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:288-307
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942241255195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942241255195
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942241255195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dupuy, Kendra & Ron, James & Prakash, Aseem, 2016. "Hands Off My Regime! Governments’ Restrictions on Foreign Aid to Non-Governmental Organizations in Poor and Middle-Income Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 299-311.
    2. Tallberg, Jonas & Dellmuth, Lisa M. & Agné, Hans & Duit, Andreas, 2018. "NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access and Exchange," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 213-238, January.
    3. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    4. Tomz, Michael & Wittenberg, Jason & King, Gary, 2003. "Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 8(i01).
    5. Walter, Barbara F., 1997. "The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 335-364, July.
    6. Fortna, Virginia Page, 2003. "Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(2), pages 337-372, April.
    7. Brambor, Thomas & Clark, William Roberts & Golder, Matt, 2006. "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 63-82, January.
    8. Desirée Nilsson & Isak Svensson, 2023. "Pushing the doors open: Nonviolent action and inclusion in peace negotiations," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(1), pages 58-72, January.
    9. Fariss, Christopher J., 2014. "Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(2), pages 297-318, May.
    10. Joshi, Madhav & Quinn, Jason Michael, 2017. "Implementing the Peace: The Aggregate Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Peace Duration after Intrastate Armed Conflict," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 869-892, October.
    11. Desirée Nilsson, 2012. "Anchoring the Peace: Civil Society Actors in Peace Accords and Durable Peace," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 243-266, April.
    12. Bell, Sam R. & Bhasin, Tavishi & Clay, K. Chad & Murdie, Amanda, 2014. "Taking the Fight to Them: Neighborhood Human Rights Organizations and Domestic Protest," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 853-875, October.
    13. Chaudhry, Suparna, 2022. "The Assault on Civil Society: Explaining State Crackdown on NGOs," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 549-590, March.
    14. Smidt, Hannah & Perera, Dominic & Mitchell, Neil J. & Bakke, Kristin M., 2021. "Silencing Their Critics: How Government Restrictions Against Civil Society Affect International ‘Naming and Shaming’," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 1270-1291, July.
    15. Sam R. Bell & Risa Kitagawa, 2023. "Human rights organizations and transitional justice agenda-setting: Evidence from peace agreement provisions," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 65-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sam R. Bell & Risa Kitagawa, 2023. "Human rights organizations and transitional justice agenda-setting: Evidence from peace agreement provisions," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(1), pages 65-87, January.
    2. Sam R. Bell & Victoria Banks, 2018. "Women's Rights Organizations and Human Trafficking," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(1), pages 362-376, March.
    3. Bimal Adhikari & Jeffrey King & Lie Philip Santoso, 2024. "The limits of shame: UN shaming, NGO repression, and women's protests," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(3), pages 197-217, May.
    4. Desha M. Girod, 2015. "Reducing postconflict coup risk: The low windfall coup-proofing hypothesis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 153-174, April.
    5. Krause, Jana & Krause, Werner & Bränfors, Piia, 2018. "Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(6), pages 985-1016.
    6. Emily Hencken Ritter & Courtenay R. Conrad, 2016. "Human rights treaties and mobilized dissent against the state," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 449-475, December.
    7. Robert Brathwaite & Shanshan Lian & Amanda Murdie & Baekkwan Park, 2025. "Tailoring the message: A new dataset on the dyadic nature of NGO shaming in the media," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1304-1316, July.
    8. Byung-Deuk Woo & Hoshik Nam, 2024. "Women and Peace Theory and Civil Conflict Intensity," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    9. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Jana von Stein & Erik Gartzke, 2008. "International Organizations Count," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(2), pages 175-188, April.
    10. Paul F. Diehl, 2006. "Just a Phase?: Integrating Conflict Dynamics Over Time," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(3), pages 199-210, July.
    11. Randall J. Blimes, 2006. "The Indirect Effect of Ethnic Heterogeneity on the Likelihood of Civil War Onset," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(4), pages 536-547, August.
    12. Fiedler, Charlotte, 2015. "Towers of strength in turbulent times? Assessing the effectiveness of international support to peace and democracy in Kenya and Kyrgyzstan in the aftermath of interethnic violence," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Dukalskis, Alexander, 2022. "A Fox in the Henhouse: China, Normative Change, and the United Nations Human Rights Council," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt3f04q4q5, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    14. Francesca Parente, 2025. "Domestic accountability and non-compliance with international law: Evidence from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(1), pages 119-133, January.
    15. Joseph M Cox, 2020. "Negotiating justice: Ceasefires, peace agreements, and post-conflict justice," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(3), pages 466-481, May.
    16. Daniel Berliner, 2016. "Transnational advocacy and domestic law: International NGOs and the design of freedom of information laws," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 121-144, March.
    17. Rosa M. Sanchez Salgado, 2023. "The many faces of the politics of shame in European policymaking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 525-547, September.
    18. Darren Filson & Suzanne Werner, 2007. "The Dynamics of Bargaining and War," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 31-50, January.
    19. Dursun Peksen & Robert G. Blanton, 2017. "The impact of ILO conventions on worker rights: Are empty promises worse than no promises?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 75-94, March.
    20. Mark Copelovitch & David Ohls, 2012. "Trade, institutions, and the timing of GATT/WTO accession in post-colonial states," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 81-107, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:42:y:2025:i:3:p:288-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.