IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v9y2000i4p460-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating and Constraining Factors on Autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Ireen M. Proot

    (Institute for Bioethics)

  • Harry F.J.M. Crebolder
  • Huda Huijer Abu-Saad

    (Maastricht University)

  • Ton H.G.M. Macor

    (Martinushof, Tegelen, the Netherlands)

  • Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen

    (Institute for Bioethics and Maastricht University)

Abstract

This article describes a model “changing autonomy†which was developed in a grounded theory study among stroke patients on admission into nursing homes for rehabilitation. Three dimensions of autonomy were identified: self-determination, independence, and self-care. On admission, patients’ conditions (disabilities, multimorbidity, emotional state, and feeling like a layperson) and patients’ strategies (waiting and seeing, and acting as a subordinate) constrain autonomy. Several environmental factors facilitate patient autonomy. The nursing home sustains patient autonomy by providing a hopeful atmosphere and room for autonomy. The health professionals facilitate autonomy by giving therapy, support and information, attentiveness and respect, paternalism and teamwork. Facilitating strategies of the family encompass emotional and instrumental support. Care routines, lack of privacy, an unfamiliar environment, waiting periods, boredom, and lack of information were identified as constraining environmental factors. Developing guidelines and multidisciplinary courses regarding the approach to patient autonomy on admission is recommended .

Suggested Citation

  • Ireen M. Proot & Harry F.J.M. Crebolder & Huda Huijer Abu-Saad & Ton H.G.M. Macor & Ruud H. J. Ter Meulen, 2000. "Facilitating and Constraining Factors on Autonomy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 9(4), pages 460-478, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:460-478
    DOI: 10.1177/10547730022158690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547730022158690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547730022158690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:460-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.