IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v9y2000i4p402-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developmental Evolution of Expertise in Diabetes Self-Management

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Paterson
  • Sally Thorne

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

The following is a description of the findings of a longitudinal exploratory and descriptive research study of 22 persons nominated as expert self-managers of Type 1 diabetes. It entailed an initial interview about previous experiences with self-management, self-recorded taped diaries about self-management decisions for 1 week each, and face-to-face interviews following each weeklong recording of self-management decisions. The study generated a grounded theory about the development of expertise in diabetes self-management. The development of expertise was found to occur as transition through two or more phases, to be individualized, and to involve a complex interplay between social, contextual, and personal factors, including the individual’s developmental age. The research findings challenge the traditional understanding of rebellion in self-management as a manifestation of adolescence, behaviors other than active control as testimony to ineptitude in self-management, metabolic control as the indicator of selfmanagement ability, and the role of others as collaborators in self-management .

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Paterson & Sally Thorne, 2000. "Developmental Evolution of Expertise in Diabetes Self-Management," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 9(4), pages 402-419, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:402-419
    DOI: 10.1177/10547730022158663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547730022158663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547730022158663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:402-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.