IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v4y1995i1p50-66.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Postpartum Early Discharge

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Smith-Hanrahan

    (McGill University School of Nursing)

  • Denise Deblois

    (Royal Victoria Hospital)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a postpartum early discharge program, with home follow-up by hospital nursing staff, on the maternal fatigue and functional ability of low-risk mothers with healthy neonates. A quasi-experimental design was used. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving the early-discharge program (hospital stay less than 60 hours plus home follow-up by hospital-based nurses; n = 35) or traditional hospital care (hospital stay more than 60 hours and no home follow-up by hospital staff; n = 17). A third group emerged from those originally assigned to traditional care but later transferred to early discharge due to bed shortages (n = 29). The Rhoten Fatigue Scale and the inventory of Functional Status After Childbirth were used to collect the data at discharge and 1 and 6 weeks postpartum period. No significant differences between groups were found, suggesting that early discharge with adequate home follow-up does not affect the low-risk mother's fatigue and functional ability to any significantly greater extent than traditional care. It was also noted that regardless of type of care, the proportion of subjects reporting severe fatigue was relatively large (25%, 31%, and 19% at discharge, I and 6 weeks postpartum period), highlighting the need for further study of maternal fatigue in the postpartum period.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Smith-Hanrahan & Denise Deblois, 1995. "Postpartum Early Discharge," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 4(1), pages 50-66, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:50-66
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389500400106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389500400106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389500400106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:1:p:50-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.