IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v31y2022i2p274-283.html

Dignity and Predictors of Its Change Among Inpatients in Long-Term Care

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Kisvetrová
  • Jitka Tomanová
  • Romana HanÃ¡Ä ková
  • Peta Jane Greaves
  • Alison Steven

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify any differences in the dignity evaluation of geriatric inpatients after 1 month of hospitalization in a long-term care wards (LTC) and predictors of this change. This follow-up study included 125 geriatric inpatients who filled the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-CZ), Geriatric Depression Scale, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination. In the initial measurement, the patients rated of PDI-CZ item “Not able to perform tasks of daily living†the worst. One month after, the items “Not able to perform tasks of daily living,†“Not able to attend to bodily functions,†and “Not feeling worthwhile or valued†were improved. Patients with higher education, for whom self-sufficiency improved and depression decreased, rated their dignity more positively 1 month after the hospitalization in LTC. Our findings suggest that these factors are important for the maintenance of the dignity of older adults hospitalized in LTC.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Kisvetrová & Jitka Tomanová & Romana HanÃ¡Ä ková & Peta Jane Greaves & Alison Steven, 2022. "Dignity and Predictors of Its Change Among Inpatients in Long-Term Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(2), pages 274-283, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:274-283
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738211036969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738211036969
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738211036969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mária Sováriová Soósová & Vladimíra Timková & Lucia Dimunová & Boris Mauer, 2021. "Spirituality as a Mediator Between Depressive Symptoms and Subjective Well-being in Older Adults," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(5), pages 707-717, June.
    2. Mohammad Rababa & Ammar M. Hammouri & Issa M. Hweidi & Julie L. Ellis, 2020. "Association of nurses' level of knowledge and attitudes to ageism toward older adults: Cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 593-601, September.
    3. Debra Kerr & Rosie Crone & Trisha Dunning, 2020. "Perspectives about dignity during acute care for older people and their relatives: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4116-4127, November.
    4. Van Der Weele, T.J., 2017. "Physical activity and physical and mental well-being in church settings," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1023-1024.
    5. Fabio Ferretti & Andrea Pozza & Maurilio Pallassini & Lorenzo Righi & Fulvia Marini & Sabrina Adami & Anna Coluccia, 2019. "Gender invariance of dignity in non-terminal elderly patients with chronic diseases: a multicentric study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1645-1656, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyeon Ha & Juah Kim, 2021. "Ageism and the Factors Affecting Ageism among Korean Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Eun Hee Hwang & Kon Hee Kim, 2021. "Quality of Gerontological Nursing and Ageism: What Factors Influence on Nurses’ Ageism in South Korea?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Marta Podhorecka & Anna Pyszora & Agnieszka Woźniewicz & Jakub Husejko & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska, 2022. "Empathy as a Factor Conditioning Attitudes towards the Elderly among Physiotherapists—Results from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Ningning Liu & Qikang Zhong, 2023. "The impact of sports participation on individuals’ subjective well-being: the mediating role of class identity and health," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Wenqing Gao & Shuailong Li & Zhuoyuan Chi & Fangfang Gong & Wenxi Tang, 2022. "Transition from Nurses to Medicalized Elderly Caregivers: Comparison on Willingness between Traditional and Modern Regions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Lea Zanbar & Sagit Lev & Yifat Faran, 2022. "Can Physical, Psychological, and Social Vulnerabilities Predict Ageism?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ciro Conversano & Graziella Orrù & Andrea Pozza & Mario Miccoli & Rebecca Ciacchini & Laura Marchi & Angelo Gemignani, 2021. "Is Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Effective for People with Hypertension? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 30 Years of Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Hui‐Lin Cheng & Xian‐Liang Liu & Rui‐Xue Bi & Lan‐Fang Liu & Simon Ching Lam, 2020. "Two versions of perspectives on caring for older patients scale: Translation and psychometric testing among Chinese nursing students," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 903-912, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:274-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.