IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v31y2022i1p20-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation Between Functional Health Literacy and Self-efficacy in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Cross-sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Angel Cendejas Medina
  • Renan Alves Silva
  • Magda Milleyde de Sousa Lima
  • Lívia Moreira Barros
  • Rafael Oliveira Pitta Lopes
  • Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Melo
  • José Cláudio Garcia Lira Neto
  • Joselany à fio Caetano

Abstract

To analyze the correlation between functional health literacy (FHL) and self-efficacy (SE) in people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cross-sectional study was conducted among September and October 2019, with 196 people with type 2 diabetes. Data were collected using the Functional Literacy in Health instrument (B-TOFHLA) and the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DMSES). Bivariate analysis was used to verify the relationship among the constructs. Most diabetics showed an average B-TOFHLA score of 74.75, considered adequate, and self-efficacy of 4.07, high. The association between SE and FHL in the bivariate analysis found no statistical significance ( p  > .05), in the same sense as the B-TOFHLA score and the DMSES domains ( p  > .05). Constructs were not related to each other in terms of skills arising from judgments and decisions with motivational confidence by the investigated audience.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Angel Cendejas Medina & Renan Alves Silva & Magda Milleyde de Sousa Lima & Lívia Moreira Barros & Rafael Oliveira Pitta Lopes & Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Melo & José Cláudio Garcia Lira Neto, 2022. "Correlation Between Functional Health Literacy and Self-efficacy in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Cross-sectional Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(1), pages 20-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:20-28
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738211006841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738211006841
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738211006841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:20-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.