IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v30y2021i7p1047-1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Women of Reproductive Age and Factors Affecting It

Author

Listed:
  • Süreyya Gümüşsoy
  • RuÅŸen Öztürk
  • Oya Kavlak
  • Ä°smet Hortu
  • Ahmet Özgür Yeniel

Abstract

This descriptive study was designed to investigate the pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) of women aged 18 to 49 years and to examine the factors that may have an effect on PFMS. The study was conducted on 258 women who visited a gynecology outpatient clinic between January 2019 and January 2020, who met the research criteria, and who agreed to participate in the study. The data were collected using the Sociodemographic Characteristics Information Form. The Modified Oxford Scale (MOS) and a perineometer were used to evaluate the PFMS of the women. The mean PFMS value measured using the perineometer was 31.56 ± 12.17 cmH 2 O (moderate pressure). The PFMS values were 20.00 to 29.9 cmH 2 O (weak pressure) and 30.00 to 39.9 cmH 2 O (moderate pressure) in 23.6% of the women, respectively. The PFMS values measured with MOS were of grade 3 strength (moderate pressure) in 23.6% of the women and grade 2 strength (weak pressure) in 23.3%. A statistically significant strong correlation was found between the perineometer measurement and the women’s MOS values. Moreover, a statistically significant difference was found between the PFMS values measured with the perineometer, MOS scores, and women’s age groups, educational status, marital status, employment status, income status, persistent cough, use of nicotine, alcohol and coffee consumptions, chronic constipation, history of frequent urinary tract infections, regular exercise, body mass index, history of pregnancy, mode of delivery, use of episiotomy at birth, perineal rupture at birth, use of forceps vacuum at birth, multiple pregnancies, delivery of a baby weighing ≥4,000 g, treatment during pregnancy, hysterectomy, menopause, frequency of sexual intercourse, and pain during sexual intercourse ( p  

Suggested Citation

  • Süreyya Gümüşsoy & RuÅŸen Öztürk & Oya Kavlak & Ä°smet Hortu & Ahmet Özgür Yeniel, 2021. "Investigating Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Women of Reproductive Age and Factors Affecting It," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(7), pages 1047-1058, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:1047-1058
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738211000350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738211000350
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738211000350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priscylla Helouyse Angelo & Larissa Ramalho Dantas Varella & Maria Clara Eugênia de Oliveira & Monayane Grazielly Leite Matias & Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Azevedo & Luzinete Medeiros de Almeida & Paulo, 2017. "A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Gao & Shiyan Wang & Di Zhang & Hongmei Zhu & Yuanyuan Jia & Haibo Wang & Suhong Li & Xiuhong Fu & Xiuli Sun & Jianliu Wang, 2022. "Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in the First Trimester of Primipara: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:1047-1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.